[Dovecot] dovecot SASL as auth backend to exim?
hi,
i'm running dovecot branch_10 cvs on OSX 10.4.7 w/ exim 4.63.
i'd like to use Dovecot's SASL as an auth backend to exim, instead of Cyrus-SASL.
@ dovecot's sasl page:
i know there's a patch against exim 4.43:
http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/AuthenticatedSmtpUsingDovecot
that, purportedly, enables EXIM to use dovecot's SASL as an auth backend.
questions:
(1) with 'recent' updates to both dovecot/exim, is that patch still required? (2) if so, is that patch still viable/safe against 4.63? (3) can anyone provide a _specific_ example of the exim config(s) (Makefile, Router, Transport) they're using to 'make it work'?
i've asked this question @ exim list, but, other than a 'why would you bother?' and a 'good luck with your efforts', no "joy" so far ...
thanks,
richard
--
/"
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML email, vCards
/ \ & micro$oft attachments
[GPG] OpenMacNews at gmail dot com fingerprint: 50C9 1C46 2F8F DE42 2EDB D460 95F7 DDBD 3671 08C6
OpenMacNews wrote:
hi,
i'm running dovecot branch_10 cvs on OSX 10.4.7 w/ exim 4.63.
i'd like to use Dovecot's SASL as an auth backend to exim, instead of Cyrus-SASL.
@ dovecot's sasl page:
i know there's a patch against exim 4.43:
http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/AuthenticatedSmtpUsingDovecot
that, purportedly, enables EXIM to use dovecot's SASL as an auth backend.
questions:
(1) with 'recent' updates to both dovecot/exim, is that patch still required?
I guess so
(2) if so, is that patch still viable/safe against 4.63?
Well it applies cleanly (after substituting "exim-4.63" for "exim-4.43") and seems to build OK (on Solaris 10)
(3) can anyone provide a _specific_ example of the exim config(s) (Makefile, Router, Transport) they're using to 'make it work'?
No, but I'd try what was suggested in the "authenticators" section; something like :-
begin authenticators
ntlm: driver = dovecot public_name = NTLM server_socket = /var/authentication_socket_path server_set_id = $1
... etc.
i've asked this question @ exim list, but, other than a 'why would you bother?' and a 'good luck with your efforts', no "joy" so far ...
thanks,
richard
Best Wishes, Chris
-- --+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+- Christopher Wakelin, c.d.wakelin@reading.ac.uk IT Services Centre, The University of Reading, Tel: +44 (0)118 378 8439 Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 2AF, UK Fax: +44 (0)118 975 3094
participants (2)
-
Chris Wakelin
-
OpenMacNews