Tried mailing the maintainer, but didn't get a response -- anyone know what's happened to the ATrpms repo?
Not only is http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/ empty, but: http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el6/ seems to return a 404. Some of the mirrors still have the packages, but does anyone know if they're going to continue to build 2.2.x packages?
w
Am 15.07.2014 05:42, schrieb Will Yardley:
Tried mailing the maintainer, but didn't get a response -- anyone know what's happened to the ATrpms repo?
Not only is http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/ empty, but: http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el6/ seems to return a 404. Some of the mirrors still have the packages, but does anyone know if they're going to continue to build 2.2.x packages?
avoid ATrpms
enable this repo unconditionally sooner or later will *** your OS installation because he overrides base packages often in incompatible ways and mixed with sane repos like rpmfusion years ago already leaded in randomly crashing applications
additionally the packages are poor tested
i remember a WLAN driver which crashed my system after an update and the reponse was "sorry typo" which means for me careless maintaining
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:43:32AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Not only is http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/ empty, but: http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el6/ seems to return a 404. Some of the mirrors still have the packages, but does anyone know if they're going to continue to build 2.2.x packages?
avoid ATrpms
enable this repo unconditionally sooner or later will *** your OS installation because he overrides base packages often in incompatible ways and mixed with sane repos like rpmfusion years ago already leaded in randomly crashing applications
We don't have the repo enabled - we're just pulling in the package into our internal repo (after testing). That said, I'm happy to get recommendations for any RHEL6 repos that have Dovecot 2.2.x (or SRPMs that will build cleanly on EL6).
While I'm comfortable with my ability to build my own packages, I'd rather not have to. Unfortunately, 2.1 didn't work properly with our setup (proxy / backend on the same machines), so despite some recent bugs, I need 2.2 train.
w
On 07/15/2014 03:42 AM Will Yardley wrote:
Tried mailing the maintainer, but didn't get a response -- anyone know what's happened to the ATrpms repo?
dunno :)
Not only is http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/ empty, but: http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el6/ seems to return a 404. Some of the mirrors still have the packages, but does anyone know if they're going to continue to build 2.2.x packages?
There are some mirrors: http://atrpms.net/documentation/mirrors/
Regards, Pascal
The trapper recommends today: f007ba11.1419620@localdomain.org
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:04:22PM +0000, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 07/15/2014 03:42 AM Will Yardley wrote:
Not only is http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/ empty, but: http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el6/ seems to return a 404. Some of the mirrors still have the packages, but does anyone know if they're going to continue to build 2.2.x packages?
There are some mirrors: http://atrpms.net/documentation/mirrors/
Yes, I can get to some of the mirrors, and they still have the latest version that atrpms packaged, but it's a little disconcerting that the main site has been broken for this long without an announcement. I thought it could be related to a security breach, but haven't heard anything so far.
There are some pending bugs in their Bugzilla database, all assigned to the main guy (Axel), but don't see any status changes on them.
w
participants (3)
-
Pascal Volk
-
Reindl Harald
-
Will Yardley