[Dovecot] dovecot 1.1beta2 and dovecot-sieve 1.1.2 - crash in LDA
Hi,
I've upgraded to dovecot 1.1beta2 and the latest dovecot-sieve release yesterday and have one single mail that cannot be delivered repeatedly.
Log (reformatted): Oct 12 15:19:19 vs02 deliver(bernilrz): pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed Oct 12 15:19:19 vs02 deliver(bernilrz): Raw backtrace: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(i_syslog_panic_handler+0x1e) [0x47117e] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x470eac] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x47929b] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x46f3e3] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(buffer_write+0x9d) [0x46f70d] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x469aaf] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(message_header_decode+0x104) [0x469c14] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(message_header_decode_utf8+0x4b) [0x469d4b] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x43f3eb] -> /usr/local /libexec/dovecot/deliver(index_mail_get_headers+0x42) [0x4401c2] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda/lib90_cmusieve_plugin.so [0x2b662df67d87] -> /usr/local/lib /dovecot/lda/lib90_cmusieve_plugin.so [0x2b662df716e8] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda/lib90_cmusieve_plugin.so(sieve_eval_bc+0x395) [0x2b662df72665] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda/lib90_cmusieve_plugin.so(sieve_execute_bytecode+0xfa) [0x2b662df77daa] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda/lib90_cmusieve_plugin.so(cmu_sieve_run+0x318) [0x2b662df689b8] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda/lib90_cmusieve_plugin.so [0x2b662df66d96] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(main+0xe74) [0x417d24] -> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x2b662da15b44] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x416079]
All other mails work fine, so there is probably something corner case here.
Timo, I'll send you the mail in private.
Regards, Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt berni@birkenwald.de wrote:
I've upgraded to dovecot 1.1beta2 and the latest dovecot-sieve release yesterday and have one single mail that cannot be delivered repeatedly.
Screw that, fixed already in the latest hg version, probably with changeset 58d9f94b9919.
Thanks, Bernhard
participants (1)
-
Bernhard Schmidt