Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot road-map
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:11:33 +0300 From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> To: Kupor Laszlo <willy@dunanet.hu> Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot road-map
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 09:54 +0200, Kupor Laszlo wrote:
Hello,
I track dovecot m-list, and i wan't migrate to dovecot, but now dovecot has no maildir++ quota in public release(beta etc). Without quota support dovcot not a solution for me. Please if dovecot have a release plan, post to me.
I'll release beta4 today which will have Maildir++ quota support. It's not well tested yet, but if there are bugs they should be easy to fix now. :)
I have to agree that dovecot's inability to react to filesystem quotas is a major deficiency. This feature should not rely on plug-ins, mailbox format, etc. It should be built into the base code, IMHO.
Jeff Earickson Colby College
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:00 -0400, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
I track dovecot m-list, and i wan't migrate to dovecot, but now dovecot has no maildir++ quota in public release(beta etc). Without quota support dovcot not a solution for me. Please if dovecot have a release plan, post to me.
I'll release beta4 today which will have Maildir++ quota support. It's not well tested yet, but if there are bugs they should be easy to fix now. :)
I have to agree that dovecot's inability to react to filesystem quotas is a major deficiency. This feature should not rely on plug-ins, mailbox format, etc. It should be built into the base code, IMHO.
If you mean Dovecot's inability to handle properly the write errors that come from not having enough quota/disk space, then you're right. It can't really even be implemented as a plugin. But it's just not simple to implement, and since it can be worked around for now, there are more important things that need to be done..
participants (2)
-
Jeff A. Earickson
-
Timo Sirainen