[Dovecot] v1.1.beta4 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz.sig
Lots of fixes since beta3, but apparently there are still a few bugs left:
- Is SORT working?
- APPEND seems to have problems in some setups.
- Still some SEARCH TEXT problems? Or Squat indexing problems?
I'm having trouble finding which threads relate to these bugs (other than the very recent "SEARCH TEXT" problems).
Would someone be willing to point me at the relevant info?
Thanks -Andrew
-----Original Message----- From: dovecot-bounces+aflannery=ocad.ca@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-bounces+aflannery=ocad.ca@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Timo Sirainen Sent: 23 October 2007 10:07 To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta4 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz.sig
Lots of fixes since beta3, but apparently there are still a few bugs left:
- Is SORT working?
- APPEND seems to have problems in some setups.
- Still some SEARCH TEXT problems? Or Squat indexing problems?
On 23.10.2007, at 18.18, Flannery, Andrew wrote:
I'm having trouble finding which threads relate to these bugs (other than the very recent "SEARCH TEXT" problems). ..
- Is SORT working?
This is from some private mails. I haven't heard about this since beta3.
- APPEND seems to have problems in some setups.
Some people have complained ("beta3" or "b3" or something in subject)
that Squirrelmail disconnects. Also one said that Evolution doesn't
save messages. I've Evolution working fine though. I think. :)
Probably some bug in the new istream-crlf.c though. I'll try to
figure out soon if I can reproduce this somehow.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hello,
I've seen that copy with hardlinks changed the default to yes:
# the performance much better, and it's unlikely to have any side effects.
- -#maildir_copy_with_hardlinks = no +#maildir_copy_with_hardlinks = yes
Does it now work with shared name spaces, that the mail is now copied instead of linked, in order to apply the different ownership and permission?
Bye,
Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRx7wXS9SORjhbDpvAQLxngf/fljSKt1KYgq7ypYhjtOlU0ySIkzcevO8 pjvMFlzANLXvDxxPaeoevCtvhKryY9yBbRfFRoX5fUiems/DyU5dhsRrsnqsAo9o HMrfouXowoX44F2v013GiyHR97np75gWYxRvkaB9otdDqsH2FErEYYnR3+Pbz12U K4nOim0Fs6sLexZ/DouxfPJ9z+S+ae90LuxsliL08Kyvfh7BznaL2J8F1KVrRz4x +2Ea+N6spJLtP5Mby/LPJzr106+S+bC3YoC1jQH3M8OMOPAlXNbMoahfeOOFpnUk GopNOv1cspMkGsswAu/GRKBd3yA695ngTluLDBCce8AYbEV/cWtB0A== =cJGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 09:12 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
I've seen that copy with hardlinks changed the default to yes:
# the performance much better, and it's unlikely to have any side effects.
- -#maildir_copy_with_hardlinks = no +#maildir_copy_with_hardlinks = yes
Does it now work with shared name spaces, that the mail is now copied instead of linked, in order to apply the different ownership and permission?
Yes.
participants (3)
-
Flannery, Andrew
-
Steffen Kaiser
-
Timo Sirainen