Message: 3
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:08:58 +0200
From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] use of deliver from procmail advisable?
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Message-ID: <20070815160858.GA22429@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
also sprach Jerry Yeager <jerry@scene-naturally.dyndns.org>
[2007.08.15.1758 +0200]:
a) Postfix milter to run ClamAv, eh something like this (for Linux
fans)
b) then use the regular Postfix <--> SpamAssassin <--> LDA (with
sieve)
setup (message routing via Postfix master.cf) so that individual
users can
set their own SA rules and vacation stuff.
This is exactly how I used to have it but then the need for
a vacation autoresponse to the From: address (as opposed to
Return-Path) arose and I had to switch to procmail:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-August/024766.html
Before that, I was using spamc with --pipe-to, but always had a bad
feeling about that, since the manpage says:
Note that there is a very slight chance mail will be lost here,
because if the fork-and-exec fails there?s no place to put the
mail message.
and my message to SA-users on this was never answered[0].
- http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=115185095923772&w=2
Now I am using procmail and at least now that failure will cause
postfix to defer a message.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
half a bee, philosophically, must ipso facto half not be.
but half the bee has got to be, vis-a-vis its entity. you see?
but can a bee be said to be or not to be an entire bee,
when half the bee is not a bee, due to some ancient injury?
-- monty python
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net