Hello,
Using the latest dovecot version, selecting a non-existing mailbox with non printable characters encoded in utf7, the mailbox doesn't exist response contains the folder name encoded in utf8.
Is that legal regarding the rfc ?
If yes, how the client can be aware of the used encoding ?
Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Cornelius Charlie wrote:
Using the latest dovecot version, selecting a non-existing mailbox with non printable characters encoded in utf7, the mailbox doesn't exist response contains the folder name encoded in utf8.
the comment is just an human readable string.
Is that legal regarding the rfc ?
If yes, how the client can be aware of the used encoding ?
Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1
iQEVAwUBVzF8GXz1H7kL/d9rAQLlAwf/RYA3chqcqvm/MkNI7PaEMCGn5loKCrcC T1AMMwhXfWzIH0+BNmr7gVVRQoWzxfGcfSvKUZbK20flaREt9S9SeokmAFc1qD7X LkQ6Wt87pS/24HZmUt/KhK9yhxxFfki3J77McRV2ookBmjx3x6oMYH5QdViOkNQg OBT7pGbbKieRpr6e9o3PFnXBx3hcGndGSFinybgE6KF19dI9chIOWW+B3XF2KYVf aB/wY4u2KI1nADHj/mfSTxqLGQgvwlEv95xofn+h5jjeTT+P01ML+rjbMaKDpgdd x5iMCIeKSZiSZpK71A1+4ySHXlG3qU6Cnl1yxJ8GGJAHks7YA7bFJQ== =UTgP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Cornelius Charlie
-
Steffen Kaiser