Hello,
scenario:
OK 1. created vacation script (see below) OK 2. send message from user@anotherdomain.tld to user@domain.tld => got auto vacation response (2010-02-11T19:42:13) OK 3. send message from user@anotherdomain.tld to user@domain.tld => no response (is ok because ":days 1" settings) (2010-02-11T19:47:46) BAD 4. send message from anotheruser@anotherdomain.tld to user@domain.tld => no response (2010-02-11T19:48:04)
Why is discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered to user@domain.tld ?
log: 2010-02-11T19:42:13.669321+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=052a01caab49$ec4752e0$c4d5f8a0$@tld: sent vacation response to user@anotherdomain.tld 2010-02-11T19:42:13.732541+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=052a01caab49$ec4752e0$c4d5f8a0$@tld: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' 2010-02-11T19:47:46.271534+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=053201caab4a$b295ece0$17c1c6a0$@tld: discarded duplicate vacation response to user@anotherdomain.tld 2010-02-11T19:47:46.275891+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=053201caab4a$b295ece0$17c1c6a0$@tld: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' 2010-02-11T19:48:04.958622+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=053701caab4a$bda90220$38fb0660$@tld: discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered to user@domain.tld 2010-02-11T19:48:04.965875+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=053701caab4a$bda90220$38fb0660$@tld: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX'
vacation script:
require "vacation";
vacation :days 1 :subject "Auto reply"
"auto reply message";
Thank you
Lampa
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Lampa wrote:
BAD 4. send message from anotheruser@anotherdomain.tld to user@domain.tld => no response (2010-02-11T19:48:04)
Why is discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered to user@domain.tld ?
See: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5230 Sec 4.5
list all and any address via :addresses.
Or, alternatively, hack the Sieve plugin to ignore the address check.
Regards,
Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBS3Uug7+Vh58GPL/cAQKmrQf/R53EFVyPo2D3NUpFEQn2gQszIsIiu8wa NoM26lWp596h/EAQC0gtqfWPa89ojuwwH8aM1uzwgnd/kA1zaQq+l5wCQoXo9Xtj BztKZCMQb0ZvZHEipRnuWo/Cno6DjsY9+xix+ZwPKjsnsPeQYXC1QEgoifLBPjmY 93n3WluMdGi2GIA4+mxpyIZpEGFc/Hpo7xvrrcBVSUevBhy78CmaB95+7kb/tmgj YTe5hzctFJhcEFwomXyqd55sUxqAncFPjDZwl+8W+vtoLs1Ki40UqMtX5K8ZkDVo BIaIwjDJ5bmHdsZbmRHecRsnD/WosSViKgazplh03rDeQeq+xH6dng== =G2M4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Lampa
-
Steffen Kaiser