[Dovecot] Re: Expunge is not expunging unless called twice--revisited
On Tue May 30 05:45:12 EEST 2006, Jeff Blank jb000002 at mr-happy.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm running dovecot-1.0.beta8 from FreeBSD ports, using mbox mail store. My problem appears to have come up on the list about a month ago, "Expunge is not expunging unless it is called twice". I ran through Bill Boebel's telnet-IMAP session for myself, and I see that his test case is now fixed (as Timo said), but mutt, for whatever reason, uses +FLAGS.SILENT, and I'm still getting the behaviour in Bill's original problem when I telnet and use +FLAGS.SILENT:
1 OK Logged in. 2 select INBOX
- FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
- OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)]
- Flags permitted.
- 1 EXISTS
- 1 RECENT
- OK [UNSEEN 1] First unseen.
- OK [UIDVALIDITY 1148956034] UIDs valid
- OK [UIDNEXT 4] Predicted next UID 2 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed. 3 UID STORE 3 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 3 OK Store completed. 4 expunge 4 OK Expunge completed. 5 expunge
- 1 EXPUNGE
- 0 RECENT 5 OK Expunge completed.
After step 4, the message is still in the mailbox with "X-Status: D"; the second expunge is required to remove it. I seem to get the same behaviour with Thunderbird, so is this still a dovecot problem? (I have Thunderbird set up to remove deleted messages immediately, not move to trash or just mark as deleted.)
I'm also still experiencing the twice-needed expunge problem (with mutt and +FLAGS.SILENT) just as Jeff described it. I have the problem both with Beta8 and with last night's CVS snapshot. I'm using Maildir.
Thanks very much, Glenn
Glenn Leavell wrote on 6/4/2006 9:39 PM:
On Tue May 30 05:45:12 EEST 2006, Jeff Blank jb000002 at mr-happy.com wrote:
I'm running dovecot-1.0.beta8 from FreeBSD ports, using mbox mail store. My problem appears to have come up on the list about a month ago, "Expunge is not expunging unless it is called twice". I ran through Bill Boebel's telnet-IMAP session for myself, and I see that his test case is now fixed (as Timo said), but mutt, for whatever reason, uses +FLAGS.SILENT, and I'm still getting the behaviour in Bill's original problem when I telnet and use +FLAGS.SILENT:
I'm also still experiencing the twice-needed expunge problem (with mutt and +FLAGS.SILENT) just as Jeff described it. I have the problem both with Beta8 and with last night's CVS snapshot. I'm using Maildir.
We're seeing similar (double expunge required) problems here as well - FreeBSD 6.1, Dovecot 1.0b8 from ports, Maildir, Eudora 6.2 as the client.
Chris
participants (2)
-
Christopher P. Gilmore
-
Glenn Leavell