[Dovecot] v0.99.11 released
v0.99.11 2004-09-04 Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
+ 127.* and ::1 IP addresses are treated as secured with
disable_plaintext_auth = yes
+ auth_debug setting for extra authentication debugging
+ Some documentation and error message updates
+ Create PID file in /var/run/dovecot/master.pid
+ home setting is now optional in static userdb
+ Added mail setting to static userdb
- After APPENDing to selected mailbox Dovecot didn't always notice the
new mail immediately which broke some clients
- THREAD and SORT commands crashed with some mails
- If APPENDed mail ended with CR character, Dovecot aborted the saving
- Output streams sometimes sent data duplicated and lost part of it.
This could have caused various strange problems, but looks like in
practise it rarely caused real problems.Today, Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> wrote:
v0.99.11 2004-09-04 Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Congratulations (-:
I'm sorry to get to you so late with this question, but what happened to the namespace fixes that were in e.g. 0.99.11-test4? Does this change have anything to do with it: <URL:http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2004-July/002978.html>?
I'd really like to continue using my "mail."-prefixed imap mailboxes (-:
Thanks,
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@boinkor.net>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs
On 4.9.2004, at 14:56, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Depends on what you mean with 0.99.11-test4.. I think there was a _very_ old version with that version number, but those changes are now only in 1.0-test tree. In 0.99.x releases there have never been proper namespace support. So if you want them, use 1.0-test releases.
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 02:19:53PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
v0.99.11 2004-09-04 Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Updated cram-md5 patch for 0.99.x at http://www.roughtrade.net/dovecot/dovecot-crammd5-0.99.11.diff
J
-- Joshua Goodall "as modern as tomorrow afternoon" joshua@roughtrade.net - FW109
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004, Joshua Goodall wrote:
hmm, when I built the .debs for 0.99.11, I just used the old patch and it applied cleanly. Am I likely to run into trouble?
-- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 10:12:14AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
hmm, when I built the .debs for 0.99.11, I just used the old patch and it applied cleanly. Am I likely to run into trouble?
If you apply the old patch, you get a .rej file. patch --verbose is your friend.
J
-- Joshua Goodall "as modern as tomorrow afternoon" joshua@roughtrade.net - FW109
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 06-09-2004 09:56, Tino Keitel wrote: | On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 14:19:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: | |>v0.99.11 2004-09-04 Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> | | | [...] | | |> - After APPENDing to selected mailbox Dovecot didn't always notice |> the |> new mail immediately which broke some clients | | | This fixed my problem with isync, thanks.
...and offlineimap (a similar tool written in Python), it seems.
I suspected internal problems in offlineimap so didn't report earlier.
~ - Jonas
- Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
- Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
~ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBPCAun7DbMsAkQLgRAk2WAJ97tdjVucpj9dQ+93j9+xZZoaNHsQCcCQtr 9d1Dat6lZ2nYj9EJmAl/+Zw= =jN8P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (6)
-
Andreas Fuchs
-
Jaldhar H. Vyas
-
Jonas Smedegaard
-
Joshua Goodall
-
Timo Sirainen
-
Tino Keitel