On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 23:45 +0200, Stian Jordet wrote:

But after reading the documentation, it seems I now have to use two ldap-fields to achieve the same thing? One "quota" and one "quota_rule"? Is this correct? It's of course not impossible, but it's kinda a hassle to hand craft a new schema, deploy, and update all the user's entries.

If my users didn't have two kind of quotas, it would be easy, but with two quota methods, I don't see any other way than to use two ldap-fields. Which I hope I don't have to :)

Well.. If your virtual users don't all have the same quota then yes, you'll have to use two fields. Otherwise you could kludge around it :)

plugin { quota_rule = *:storage=2G }

Then have LDAP return quota=fs:noenforcing or quota=maildir.

Or alternatively if your system users are also in /etc/passwd, or you're using nss_ldap or something, you could do something like:

userdb passwd { args = quota=fs:noenforcing } userdb ldap { args = .. } plugin { quota = maildir }

And return quota_rule from ldap.