[Dovecot] dovecot enterprise release
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but...:
On the dovecot enterprise release pages, only debian 6 compatibility is shown. Are there any plans to support wheezy? (as 7 is stable now, and we are running it...)
Regards, Mourik Jan
On 18.6.2013, at 12.32, mourik jan SOGo <heupink@merit.unu.edu> wrote:
Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but...:
On the dovecot enterprise release pages, only debian 6 compatibility is shown. Are there any plans to support wheezy? (as 7 is stable now, and we are running it…)
Wheezy is supported already as well. I guess the web page needs updating.
mourik jan SOGo skrev den 2013-06-18 11:32:
On the dovecot enterprise release pages, only debian 6 compatibility is shown. Are there any plans to support wheezy? (as 7 is stable now, and we are running it...)
apt-get source dovecot -b
will not work ?, if not then your enterprise is building on precompiled problems
-- senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
On 6/20/2013 10:54, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On the dovecot enterprise release pages, only debian 6 compatibility is shown. Are there any plans to support wheezy? (as 7 is stable now, and we are running it...)
apt-get source dovecot -b
will not work ?, if not then your enterprise is building on precompiled problems
I'm not sure I understand..?
mourik jan heupink skrev den 2013-06-20 11:53:
I'm not sure I understand..?
dovecot is opensource, so why depend on someone that will not package it for enterprise ?
get the tarballs. create a deb package. install, be happy
-- senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
dovecot is opensource, so why depend on someone that will not package it for enterprise ?
get the tarballs. create a deb package. install, be happy
Ah right. :-)
But the advantage of using the http://www.dovecot.fi/ 'enterprise dovecot' would be that they provide up-to-date versions of dovecot.
And currently we're running debian wheezy with it's default dovecot, version 2.1.7.
MJ
mourik jan heupink skrev den 2013-06-20 12:17:
Ah right. :-)
+1
But the advantage of using the http://www.dovecot.fi/ 'enterprise dovecot' would be that they provide up-to-date versions of dovecot.
is there code changes in dovecot for enterprise ?, does it need a patch ?
do you really belive Timo take his dev time to test on enterprise ?
its waste of time
And currently we're running debian wheezy with it's default dovecot, version 2.1.7.
all that counts is glibc/gcc, and the source tarballs, the rest is up to YOU
-- senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
Am 20.06.2013 12:25, schrieb Benny Pedersen: is there code changes in dovecot for enterprise ?, does it need a patch ? do you really belive Timo take his dev time to test on enterprise ? its waste of time
Am 20.06.2013 10:54, schrieb Benny Pedersen:> mourik jan SOGo skrev den 2013-06-18 11:32: apt-get source dovecot -b will not work ?, if not then your enterprise is building on precompiled problems
benny stop your foolish trolling and no idea what "enterprise" means you have little to zero technical knowledge but your mouth wide open
examples why benny is only a clueless troll? try to explain the postfix-developer how postfix works is ridiculous
wietse@porcupine.org skrev den 2013-06-15 16:13: The server does not announce or accept AUTH, therefore AUTH it is disabled Benny: auth does not need starttls, if auth is not anounced then auth is disabled
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/cutoff=237641
postfix have both auth and starttls, starttls is just for clients to use ssl/tls on port 25
STARTTLS has *nothing* to with the port
email clients will not use starttls in 2013, since submission is the right thing anyway
*foolish idiot* - clients will use STARTTLS *on* submission in 2013 which is *nothing else* than smptd on Port 587 and usually requires auth and if you have zero to nothing of a clue *shut up*
wietse@porcupine.org skrev den 2013-06-15 16:13: The server does not announce or accept AUTH, therefore AUTH it is disabled auth does not need starttls, if auth is not anounced then auth is disabled
*foolish idiot* with "smtpd_tls_auth_only" it *is not* announced *until* the TLS handshake between server and client is done
Reindl Harald skrev den 2013-06-20 14:41:
Am 20.06.2013 12:25, schrieb Benny Pedersen: is there code changes in dovecot for enterprise ?, does it need a patch ? do you really belive Timo take his dev time to test on enterprise ? its waste of time
Am 20.06.2013 10:54, schrieb Benny Pedersen:> mourik jan SOGo skrev den 2013-06-18 11:32: apt-get source dovecot -b will not work ?, if not then your enterprise is building on precompiled problems
benny stop your foolish trolling and no idea what "enterprise" means you have little to zero technical knowledge but your mouth wide open
examples why benny is only a clueless troll? try to explain the postfix-developer how postfix works is ridiculous
wietse@porcupine.org skrev den 2013-06-15 16:13: The server does not announce or accept AUTH, therefore AUTH it is disabled Benny: auth does not need starttls, if auth is not anounced then auth is disabled
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/cutoff=237641
postfix have both auth and starttls, starttls is just for clients to use ssl/tls on port 25
STARTTLS has *nothing* to with the port
email clients will not use starttls in 2013, since submission is the right thing anyway
*foolish idiot* - clients will use STARTTLS *on* submission in 2013 which is *nothing else* than smptd on Port 587 and usually requires auth and if you have zero to nothing of a clue *shut up*
wietse@porcupine.org skrev den 2013-06-15 16:13: The server does not announce or accept AUTH, therefore AUTH it is disabled auth does not need starttls, if auth is not anounced then auth is disabled
*foolish idiot* with "smtpd_tls_auth_only" it *is not* announced *until* the TLS handshake between server and client is done
-- senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
and why do you troll see the need to mail Wietse what he already knows? people like *you* are the reason why others get moderated or blocked because they can no longer hear bullshit-answers
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/cutoff=237641
Benny Pedersen: auth does not need starttls, if auth is not anounced then auth is disabled
AUTH requires STARTTLS with smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes.
In view of your contributions in recent threads, you are one step away from removal from this mailing list
Am 20.06.2013 15:27, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Reindl Harald skrev den 2013-06-20 14:41:
Am 20.06.2013 12:25, schrieb Benny Pedersen: is there code changes in dovecot for enterprise ?, does it need a patch ? do you really belive Timo take his dev time to test on enterprise ? its waste of time
Am 20.06.2013 10:54, schrieb Benny Pedersen:> mourik jan SOGo skrev den 2013-06-18 11:32: apt-get source dovecot -b will not work ?, if not then your enterprise is building on precompiled problems
benny stop your foolish trolling and no idea what "enterprise" means you have little to zero technical knowledge but your mouth wide open
examples why benny is only a clueless troll? try to explain the postfix-developer how postfix works is ridiculous
wietse@porcupine.org skrev den 2013-06-15 16:13: The server does not announce or accept AUTH, therefore AUTH it is disabled Benny: auth does not need starttls, if auth is not anounced then auth is disabled
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/cutoff=237641
postfix have both auth and starttls, starttls is just for clients to use ssl/tls on port 25
STARTTLS has *nothing* to with the port
email clients will not use starttls in 2013, since submission is the right thing anyway
*foolish idiot* - clients will use STARTTLS *on* submission in 2013 which is *nothing else* than smptd on Port 587 and usually requires auth and if you have zero to nothing of a clue *shut up*
wietse@porcupine.org skrev den 2013-06-15 16:13: The server does not announce or accept AUTH, therefore AUTH it is disabled auth does not need starttls, if auth is not anounced then auth is disabled
*foolish idiot* with "smtpd_tls_auth_only" it *is not* announced *until* the TLS handshake between server and client is done
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:54:15 +0200 Reindl Harald articulated:
and why do you troll see the need to mail Wietse what he already knows? people like *you* are the reason why others get moderated or blocked because they can no longer hear bullshit-answers
Wrong! Most people get bounced because they either "feed the trolls", continually propagate misinformation under the guise of fact or continue to argue a point after they have been proven wrong.
-- Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
Am 20.06.2013 16:34, schrieb Jerry:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:54:15 +0200 Reindl Harald articulated:
and why do you troll see the need to mail Wietse what he already knows? people like *you* are the reason why others get moderated or blocked because they can no longer hear bullshit-answers
Wrong! Most people get bounced because they either "feed the trolls", continually propagate misinformation under the guise of fact or continue to argue a point after they have been proven wrong
*not* wrong
i got not only one time bounced because i did no longer find any nice word for idiots which argue a point after they have been proven wrong instead the foolish trolls like the one i answered here
participants (6)
-
Benny Pedersen
-
Jerry
-
mourik jan heupink
-
mourik jan SOGo
-
Reindl Harald
-
Timo Sirainen