http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/
- Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :)
- We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could really have broken things (broke it in test12).
So, what's left is to make PAM work well..
Can anyone pinpoint exactly when SSL began to have problems?
I'm using 0.9.99.1 on two servers:
- Redhat 7.3 with openssl-0.9.6b-30.7
- Gentoo with openssl-0.9.6i
The Redhat server serves about 30 users, some POP3, some IMAP. At least half use SSL (because they're ouside the LAN).
I haven't had any problem, so I'm just wondering when these errors began.
Zach.
On 18 Jun 2003 04:42:01 +0300, Timo Sirainen tss@iki.fi wrote:
http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/
- Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :)
- We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could really have broken things (broke it in test12).
So, what's left is to make PAM work well..
-- Services & Support Bulletin Wireless | www.bulletinwireless.com This email is digitally signed | Key ID 0x3F9AA9A2
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 15:42, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/
- Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :)
- We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could really have broken things (broke it in test12).
So, what's left is to make PAM work well..
openssl suddenly works on RH9 with dovecot. It seems to be stable, but speed seems to be extremely slow. Using less than 2% CPU on the Athlon 2100+ server, loading the directory indexes in Evolution feels like 5 times as long as previously with unencrypted IMAP going through a SSH tunnel. Any ideas?
Warren Togami warren@togami.com
participants (4)
-
Timo Sirainen
-
tom hensel
-
Warren Togami
-
Zach Bagnall