[Dovecot] Anyone using dovecot obox?
13 Jan
2013
13 Jan
'13
8:46 a.m.
Just looking for some input from other users of the obox (object storage) backend from dovecot.fi.
- What challenges/problem were you trying to overcome/solve by using obox?
- What kind of architecture did you deploy using obox? (e.g. distributed object storage for performance, or distributed for availability, geographic distribution of email services, etc.)
- What complexities, single points of failure, documentation omissions can you highlight having deployed the obox storage architecture?
- Did the obox backend support your email services as well as you expected or more?
- How was your interaction with Doveoct.fi?
Thanks in advance.
14 Jan
14 Jan
8:06 a.m.
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 00:46 -0600, list@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
Just looking for some input from other users of the obox (object storage) backend from dovecot.fi.
Still a bit early :) It requires Dovecot v2.2, which of course is still only in beta. So would be great if people started testing v2.2 to get it fully stabilized soon!
4333
Age (days ago)
4334
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
list@airstreamcomm.net
-
Timo Sirainen