On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote:

I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains that the folder Spam does not exist.

dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details)

So, does that Spam mailbox exist? The mailbox configuration you posted tells me that it is at least not created automatically once accessed.

Regards,

Stephan.

-----Original Message----- From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan@rename-it.nl] Sent: 16 April 2020 23:12 To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re: Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names

On 16/04/2020 21:04, Marc Roos wrote:

...

Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds

mailbox Spam {
  special_use = \Junk
  auto = no
}

dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core I can't tell without insight in the error message and your full configuration (dovecot -n).

Regards,

Stephan

On 16/04/2020 23:38, Marc Roos wrote:

It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail clients.

spam folders merging

mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk auto = create } mailbox Spam { special_use = \Junk auto = no } mailbox "Junk E-mail" { special_use = \Junk auto = no }

I think you misunderstand this feature. This does not create some magic mailbox that only exists virtually or some alias of the mailbox. Instead, it makes it possible to find the mailbox with a special use easily in a standard way.

In your configuration the three mailboxes are separate physical mailboxes.

If Spam doesn't exist, it doesn't exist until it is created explicitly.

Regards,

Stephan.

On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote:

...

I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains that the folder Spam does not exist.

dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) So, does that Spam mailbox exist? The mailbox configuration you posted tells me that it is at least not created automatically once accessed.

Regards,

Stephan.

...

-----Original Message----- From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan@rename-it.nl] Sent: 16 April 2020 23:12 To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re: Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names

On 16/04/2020 21:04, Marc Roos wrote:

...

Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds

 mailbox Spam {
   special_use = \Junk
   auto = no
 }

dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core I can't tell without insight in the error message and your full configuration (dovecot -n).

Regards,

Stephan

On 17/04/2020 00:04, Marc Roos wrote:

Hmmm, confusing, clients should then display the mailbox name redirected by the server.

If a user in a front end just sees the 'Junk E-mail', that is the name he is going to be using in his mailbox rules. If he does not know that this is actually the Junk folder on the server, he will make an incorrect message rule.

So I guess you have to correct this server side, before storing the sieve rule? Or is there something nice that magically does this for me?

If you're concerned about Sieve rules finding the correct mailbox, you can use the new specialuse extension (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8579) , if your Pigeonhole is recent enough.

Regards,

Stephan.

On 16/04/2020 23:38, Marc Roos wrote:

...

It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail clients.

# spam folders merging
mailbox Junk {
  special_use = \Junk
  auto = create
}
mailbox Spam {
  special_use = \Junk
  auto = no
}
mailbox "Junk E-mail" {
  special_use = \Junk
  auto = no
}

I think you misunderstand this feature. This does not create some magic mailbox that only exists virtually or some alias of the mailbox. Instead, it makes it possible to find the mailbox with a special use easily in a standard way.

In your configuration the three mailboxes are separate physical mailboxes.

If Spam doesn't exist, it doesn't exist until it is created explicitly.

Regards,

Stephan.

...

On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote:

...

I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains that the folder Spam does not exist.

dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of

script /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) So, does that Spam mailbox exist? The mailbox configuration you posted tells me that it is at least not created automatically once accessed.

Regards,

Stephan.

...

-----Original Message----- From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan@rename-it.nl] Sent: 16 April 2020 23:12 To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re: Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names

On 16/04/2020 21:04, Marc Roos wrote:

...

Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds

  mailbox Spam {
    special_use = \Junk
    auto = no
  }

dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core I can't tell without insight in the error message and your full configuration (dovecot -n).

Regards,

Stephan