Re: [Dovecot] XFS vs EXT4 for mail storage
Am 02.05.2013 17:31, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-05-02 10:45 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:
"man mount" is very generic and doe snot cover any option there is also no "man mount.ntfs" while "mount.ntfs" command exists
?
man mount, at least mine, shows first the FILESYSTEM INDEPENDENT MOUNT OPTIONS, then as you scroll down, you'll get to all of the additional filesystem specific options, ie, for xfs...
So, not sure what you mean by 'does not cover any option'...
typo - meant "does not cover ALL options"
someone has to write the manpages, there are millions of options all over the software-world which did it not make into manpages
google for "xfs delaylog" leads to http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_I_want_to_tune_my_XFS_filesystems_for_.3... For mount options, the only thing that will change metadata performance considerably are the logbsize and delaylog mount options
so how can it be redhat-specific if it is mentioned upstream?
participants (1)
-
Reindl Harald