[Dovecot] Some Dovecot LDA version sends MDN rather than DSN for overquota.
It appears that there is some version of the Dovecot LDA that is sending an RFC 3798 MDN rather than an RFC 3464 DSN to report non-delivery to a user who is over quota.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/693134 for a discussion of this and https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/693134/+attachment/1773018/+files/Au... for the actual MDN message.
The issue is that apparently a user was over quota and Dovecot returned an MDN with a disposition of deleted. This is intended to mean the the mail was delivered to the user but the user deleted it without reading it. If the message was actually not delivered, this should be reported to the MTA so it can return an appropriate SMTP status, or the LDA should send an RFC 3464 DSN with an action of failed.
Note that I do not actually use the Dovecot LDA nor do I have any access to the system where the notice in the bug report was received, so I may have incomplete information and this may not be relevant to current versions of Dovecot, but I think it is wrong for Dovecot to report over quota non-delivery via an MDN.
-- Mark Sapiro mark@msapiro.net The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
On 12/22/2010 08:08 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
It appears that there is some version of the Dovecot LDA that is sending an RFC 3798 MDN rather than an RFC 3464 DSN to report non-delivery to a user who is over quota.
Fixed, better late than never :) http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/264821ba38a8 http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/ee060d756630
The MDN sending was simply copied from Cyrus. So Dovecot isn't the only server sending this.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 12/22/2010 08:08 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
It appears that there is some version of the Dovecot LDA that is sending an RFC 3798 MDN rather than an RFC 3464 DSN to report non-delivery to a user who is over quota.
Fixed, better late than never :) http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/264821ba38a8 http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/ee060d756630
Thanks.
The MDN sending was simply copied from Cyrus. So Dovecot isn't the only server sending this.
:(
-- Mark Sapiro mark@msapiro.net The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
On 12.2.2012, at 18.57, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/22/2010 08:08 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
It appears that there is some version of the Dovecot LDA that is sending an RFC 3798 MDN rather than an RFC 3464 DSN to report non-delivery to a user who is over quota.
Fixed, better late than never :) The MDN sending was simply copied from Cyrus. So Dovecot isn't the only server sending this.
:(
It was actually a bit more complex than I thought. Sieve "reject" is supposed to send MDN (RFC 5228), it's only the out-of-quota error that was supposed to send DSN. So now Dovecot can send both: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/ad5298ba3229
participants (2)
-
Mark Sapiro
-
Timo Sirainen