[Dovecot] Children, HasChildren
Hello,
I'm using dovecot 0.99.10.2 on a debian box. Mailstore is maildir.If I list the IMAP hierarchy in mutt (debian, 1.5.4+20031024-1) it shows all my plain mailboxes as having subfolders - while none of them have.
I straced mutt and this is the IMAP exchange (a bit reformatted for readability):
write(6, "a0001 LSUB \"\" \"%\"\r\n", 19) = 19 read(3, "
- LSUB () \".\" \"Drafts\"
- LSUB () \".\" \"INBOX\"
- LSUB () \".\" \"Sent\"
- LSUB () \".\" \"Trash\"
- LSUB (\\Noselect \\Children) \".\" \"broadband\"
- LSUB (\\Noselect \\Children) \".\" \"cistron\"
- LSUB (\\Noselect \\Children) \".\" \"debian\"
- LSUB (\\Noselect \\Children) \".\" \"ip\"
- LSUB (\\Noselect \\Children) \".\" \"lists\"
- LSUB (\\Noselect \\Children) \".\" \"prive\" a0001 OK Lsub completed. ", 1024) = 374
Now this is strange - I read RFC3348 and shouldn't \\Children be \\HasChildren, also shouldn't the plain mailboxes (first four) be listed with \\HasNoChildren ?
Mike.
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 16:42, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
If I list the IMAP hierarchy in mutt (debian, 1.5.4+20031024-1) it shows all my plain mailboxes as having subfolders - while none of them have.
Children flags are more or less buggy.. I'll see if I can get them at least bit less buggy for 0.99.10.3.. CVS version would have them working correctly.
On 2003.11.16 16:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 16:42, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
If I list the IMAP hierarchy in mutt (debian, 1.5.4+20031024-1) it shows all my plain mailboxes as having subfolders - while none of them have.
Children flags are more or less buggy.. I'll see if I can get them at least bit less buggy for 0.99.10.3.. CVS version would have them working correctly.
Yes but - it still uses \Children and \NoChildren instead of \HasChildren and \HasNoChildren as the RFC (3348) says.
Mike.
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 19:07, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 2003.11.16 16:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 16:42, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
If I list the IMAP hierarchy in mutt (debian, 1.5.4+20031024-1) it shows all my plain mailboxes as having subfolders - while none of them have.
Children flags are more or less buggy.. I'll see if I can get them at least bit less buggy for 0.99.10.3.. CVS version would have them working correctly.
Yes but - it still uses \Children and \NoChildren instead of \HasChildren and \HasNoChildren as the RFC (3348) says.
Oh .. How did I get that wrong.. :)
participants (2)
-
Miquel van Smoorenburg
-
Timo Sirainen