[Dovecot] v2.2.1 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig
- mailbox_list_index=yes was broken.
- LAYOUT=index didn't list subscriptions.
- auth: Multiple master passdbs didn't work.
- Message parsing (e.g. during search) crashed when multipart message
didn't actually contain any parts.Message search is FIXED!
On 4/18/2013 2:41 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig
- mailbox_list_index=yes was broken. - LAYOUT=index didn't list subscriptions. - auth: Multiple master passdbs didn't work. - Message parsing (e.g. during search) crashed when multipart message didn't actually contain any parts.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig
Thanks. Any idea about when pigeonhole (v0.4.0?) for dovecot-2.2 will be released?
-- Eray Aslan eras@gentoo.org
On 4/19/2013 7:53 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig Thanks. Any idea about when pigeonhole (v0.4.0?) for dovecot-2.2 will be released?
There is one issue with the doveadm-sieve plugin that I need to solve before releasing it. That should happen some time in the coming week.
Regards,
Stephan.
On 2013-04-21 3:51 PM, Stephan Bosch stephan@rename-it.nl wrote:
On 4/19/2013 7:53 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig Thanks. Any idea about when pigeonhole (v0.4.0?) for dovecot-2.2 will be released?
There is one issue with the doveadm-sieve plugin that I need to solve before releasing it. That should happen some time in the coming week.
Hi Stephan,
Any update on when to expect this?
The gentoo ebuild maintainer is waiting for the pigeonhole release before updating the ebuild, and I'd like to get this installed on both my old and new server prior to migrating the old one to the new one (so they'll both be using the new dsync for migrating my 350+GB of mail), and am hoping to do this in the next week or two...
Thanks very much for your thankless efforts at keeping up with Timo's fast paced releases!
--
Best regards,
Charles
+1 This is holding up my migration to 2.2
Thanks to all the developer's for this amazing software....
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Charles Marcus CMarcus@media-brokers.comwrote:
On 2013-04-21 3:51 PM, Stephan Bosch stephan@rename-it.nl wrote:
On 4/19/2013 7:53 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.**2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gzhttp://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.**2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sighttp://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig
Thanks. Any idea about when pigeonhole (v0.4.0?) for dovecot-2.2 will be released?
There is one issue with the doveadm-sieve plugin that I need to solve before releasing it. That should happen some time in the coming week.
Hi Stephan,
Any update on when to expect this?
The gentoo ebuild maintainer is waiting for the pigeonhole release before updating the ebuild, and I'd like to get this installed on both my old and new server prior to migrating the old one to the new one (so they'll both be using the new dsync for migrating my 350+GB of mail), and am hoping to do this in the next week or two...
Thanks very much for your thankless efforts at keeping up with Timo's fast paced releases!
--
Best regards,
Charles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Vijay Rajah said the following on 04/05/2013 18:37:
+1 This is holding up my migration to 2.2
Thanks to all the developer's for this amazing software....
I migrated a couple of servers with a
hg clone http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/
It works.
More info on http://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/download.html
Ciao, luigi
/ +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \
Life begins when you can spend your spare time programming instead of watching television. --Cal Keegan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlGFOjEACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZQJKwCgud6MDuO4ma43x5ydFXswClQz 9lEAn3c1rG7Pm23EexwqB+d2vVjUiS7O =8uQ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Luigi Rosa lists@luigirosa.com:
Vijay Rajah said the following on 04/05/2013 18:37:
+1 This is holding up my migration to 2.2
Thanks to all the developer's for this amazing software....
I migrated a couple of servers with a
hg clone http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/
It works.
Same here.
-- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Ralf Hildebrandt skrev den 2013-05-04 19:03:
hg clone http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/ It works. Same here.
and dovecot 1.x still works here, seems that dovecot 2.x still is unstable grounds for some users following this maillist i keep my problem going :)
-- senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
Am 06.05.2013 01:59, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Ralf Hildebrandt skrev den 2013-05-04 19:03:
hg clone http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/ It works. Same here.
and dovecot 1.x still works here, seems that dovecot 2.x still is unstable grounds for some users following this maillist i keep my problem going :)
and who forces you jumping to 2.2 right now?
there is also 2.0 and 2.1 1.x does nobody interest since years
Reindl Harald skrev den 2013-05-06 02:11:
and who forces you jumping to 2.2 right now?
missing good examples on maillist that it works
there is also 2.0 and 2.1
and it will be stable 2.3 ?
1.x does nobody interest since years
its removed in gentoo, funtoo, freebsd, opensuse, and properly other stupid os's, but why care ?
-- senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 02:31 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Reindl Harald skrev den 2013-05-06 02:11:
and who forces you jumping to 2.2 right now?
missing good examples on maillist that it works
there is also 2.0 and 2.1
2.0 = abysmal 2.1 as of around 2.1.12-ish I deemed dovecot 2.anything, stable and production ready, it has yet to prove me wrong
and it will be stable 2.3 ?
The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ release this is why it often takes 10 or so point releases for most bugs to come to light and be fixed. I can assure you, I likely will not move production to 2.2 until 2.2.some_high_number
1.x does nobody interest since years
its removed in gentoo, funtoo, freebsd, opensuse, and properly other stupid os's, but why care ?
Indeed, 1.2.x was essentially unbreakable, with only one minor irritation, but that would only occur maybe once a year and then only under certain circumstances, most 1.2.x users may never even see it. There is no reason why 1.2.16 (IIRC the latest) wont be production quality in another five or more years, unless a system crippling major mother of all exploits is found in it.
On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ release this is why it often takes 10 or so point releases for most bugs to come to light and be fixed. I can assure you, I likely will not move production to 2.2 until 2.2.some_high_number
Huh?
http://www.dovecot.org/oldnews.html
Shows at least two 2.2 betas and four RC's, seven RC's of 2.1, and three betas of 2.0.
Reuben
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ release this is why it often takes 10 or so point releases for most bugs to come to light and be fixed. I can assure you, I likely will not move production to 2.2 until 2.2.some_high_number
Huh?
http://www.dovecot.org/oldnews.html
Shows at least two 2.2 betas and four RC's, seven RC's of 2.1, and three betas of 2.0.
Well, things have changed, since Timo once said he wouldn't... however, unlike some apparently, I do not live on the website, I am however on announce list, and see no messages relating to beta's or rc's there (or here from memory), where one expects to be notified :) and since it's a long way from AU to FI, and very cloudy here lately, my ESP is failing me.
PS I have not got it, but I see from this msg header you CC'd to me direct as well? why are you not honouring the list headers, which is set as reply-to list? Please fix your client.
On 6/05/2013 12:02 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ release this is why it often takes 10 or so point releases for most bugs to come to light and be fixed. I can assure you, I likely will not move production to 2.2 until 2.2.some_high_number
Huh?
http://www.dovecot.org/oldnews.html
Shows at least two 2.2 betas and four RC's, seven RC's of 2.1, and three betas of 2.0.
Well, things have changed, since Timo once said he wouldn't... however, unlike some apparently, I do not live on the website, I am however on announce list, and see no messages relating to beta's or rc's there (or here from memory), where one expects to be notified :) and since it's a long way from AU to FI, and very cloudy here lately, my ESP is failing me.
No need for ESP. This very mailing list you are subscribed to now got all those announcements. You don't even need to check the website. The NEWS list also received all of these:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/
Examples:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/140156.html http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-January/062944.html http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051544.html
I'm also in Australia and have no problems seeing these messages from FI.
PS I have not got it, but I see from this msg header you CC'd to me direct as well? why are you not honouring the list headers, which is set as reply-to list? Please fix your client.
That's what happens when you use Reply-All. Not much chance of having Thunderbird 17 "fixed" given Mozilla are winding down support for it.
My postfix logs show that your mail server accepted the mail from me at 10:56am and gave me a "250 2.0.0 OK" - which is 90 minutes ago.
Perhaps you might want to arrange for someone to fix your mail server, because you also obviously aren't receiving all the mails from all the lists you claim to be subscribed to, nor the one that my server sent you directly. There are plenty of people on this list who can probably help you with these rather complex mail issues you are experiencing ;)
Reuben
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 12:20 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Examples:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/140156.html http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-January/062944.html http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051544.html
I 've kept messages from this list since its last clean-out, in 08, those message do not appear, it seems on jan 13, dovecots mail server had no PTR entry, seems 11 messages in total missing - not my problem, no idea about earlier examples, cant be bothered getting out the tape and checking.
I'm also in Australia and have no problems seeing these messages from FI.
you missed the point of my "smart arse" remark
My postfix logs show that your mail server accepted the mail from me at 10:56am and gave me a "250 2.0.0 OK" - which is 90 minutes ago.
Perhaps you might want to arrange for someone to fix your mail server, because you also obviously aren't receiving all the mails from all the
Well, since you're so concerned, I'll go look .... /me back .. no problem exists, amavisd nuked it, it seems one of the clamav extras rulesets triggered, it just doesn't like you it seems.
directly. There are plenty of people on this list who can probably help you with these rather complex mail issues you are experiencing ;)
*chuckles* I'm rather happy with the way my anti-spam does its job, although not identical to the commercial servers since there are too many dummies running mail hosting servers and vps's,and that includes idiots in govt IT units, there have been no complaints in a long time, well, since we ceased using SORBS anyway.
Maybe you should ask for a refund, or assist with the next version.
You do program, right?
Dave
On 2013-05-06 03:09, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 12:20 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Examples:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/140156.html http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-January/062944.html http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051544.html
I 've kept messages from this list since its last clean-out, in 08, those message do not appear, it seems on jan 13, dovecots mail server had no PTR entry, seems 11 messages in total missing - not my problem, no idea about earlier examples, cant be bothered getting out the tape and checking.
I'm also in Australia and have no problems seeing these messages from FI.
you missed the point of my "smart arse" remark
My postfix logs show that your mail server accepted the mail from me at 10:56am and gave me a "250 2.0.0 OK" - which is 90 minutes ago.
Perhaps you might want to arrange for someone to fix your mail server, because you also obviously aren't receiving all the mails from all the
Well, since you're so concerned, I'll go look .... /me back .. no problem exists, amavisd nuked it, it seems one of the clamav extras rulesets triggered, it just doesn't like you it seems.
directly. There are plenty of people on this list who can probably help you with these rather complex mail issues you are experiencing ;)
*chuckles* I'm rather happy with the way my anti-spam does its job, although not identical to the commercial servers since there are too many dummies running mail hosting servers and vps's,and that includes idiots in govt IT units, there have been no complaints in a long time, well, since we ceased using SORBS anyway.
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 08:22 -0400, Dave Gattis wrote:
Maybe you should ask for a refund, or assist with the next version.
You do program, right?
I am involved in several projects already, Timo wouldn't accept anything from me anyway :)
On 2013-05-05 10:20 PM, Reuben Farrelly reuben-dovecot@reub.net wrote:
On 6/05/2013 12:02 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
I have not got it, but I see from this msg header you CC'd to me direct as well? why are you not honouring the list headers, which is set as reply-to list? Please fix your client.
That's what happens when you use Reply-All. Not much chance of having Thunderbird 17 "fixed" given Mozilla are winding down support for it.
Thunderbird has had Reply-To-List for a long time now...
But I agree, an intelligent 'Reply' button that automatically honored explicit Reply-To header, or if none present, automatically used Reply-To-List when list headers are present, and fell back to just 'Reply' if none of the above.
Bug/Feature Request added:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=868961
Feel free to vote for it...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Am 06.05.2013 04:02, schrieb Noel Butler:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found
http://www.dovecot.org/oldnews.html
Shows at least two 2.2 betas and four RC's, seven RC's of 2.1, and three betas of 2.0.
Well, things have changed, since Timo once said he wouldn't... however, unlike some apparently, I do not live on the website
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/140156.html http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-January/062944.html http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051544.html
I 've kept messages from this list since its last clean-out, in 08, those message do not appear, it seems on jan 13, dovecots mail server had no PTR entry, seems 11 messages in total missing - not my problem
stop this bullshit!
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/140156.html Received: from dovecot.org (dovecot.org [193.210.130.67])
-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.beta1 released Datum: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:33:05 +0200 Von: Timo Sirainen tss@iki.fi Antwort an: dovecot@dovecot.org An: dovecot-news@dovecot.org, dovecot@dovecot.org
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/beta/dovecot-2.2.beta1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/beta/dovecot-2.2.beta1.tar.gz.sig
Lots of fixes since 2.2.alpha1, especially related to dsync. Also dsync now supports syncing private message flags when INDEXPVT is used.
Here's again the list of all the major changes in v2.2:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 11:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
I 've kept messages from this list since its last clean-out, in 08, those message do not appear, it seems on jan 13, dovecots mail server had no PTR entry, seems 11 messages in total missing - not my problem
stop this bullshit!
if you dont wish to partake sensibly (a word that escapes you so ill stoop to your level for a moment) - fuck off
On 5/1/2013 1:35 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-04-21 3:51 PM, Stephan Bosch stephan@rename-it.nl wrote:
On 4/19/2013 7:53 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig Thanks. Any idea about when pigeonhole (v0.4.0?) for dovecot-2.2 will be released?
There is one issue with the doveadm-sieve plugin that I need to solve before releasing it. That should happen some time in the coming week.
Hi Stephan,
Any update on when to expect this?
Still working on issues with the doveadm-sieve plugin together with Timo. In every other respect it is ready for release. Pleas bear with us.
Regards,
Stephan.
On 2013-05-04 1:36 PM, Stephan Bosch stephan@rename-it.nl wrote:
On 5/1/2013 1:35 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-04-21 3:51 PM, Stephan Bosch stephan@rename-it.nl wrote:
There is one issue with the doveadm-sieve plugin that I need to solve before releasing it. That should happen some time in the coming week.
Any update on when to expect this?
Still working on issues with the doveadm-sieve plugin together with Timo. In every other respect it is ready for release. Pleas bear with us.
No problem, knew you were working on it, we're just impatient for a formal release for 2.2...
Thanks for your efforts, they are much appreciated!
Charles
On p, ápr 19, 2013 at 00:41:26 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig [...]
On OpenBSD 5.2-stable:
$ ./configure --disable-static --with-statedir=/var/dovecot --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
--mandir='${prefix}/man' --with-ssldir=/etc/ssl
--with-notify=kqueue --with-ioloop=kqueue --with-ssl=openssl
--without-pam --without-shadow --without-nss --without-vpopmail --with-pgsql
--with-solr --with-zlib --with-storages=maildir --with-pic
--with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local/ &&
make
[...] /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local//include -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -fno-builtin-strftime -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -I/usr/include -fstack-protector -MT net.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/net.Tpo -c -o net.lo net.c libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local//include -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -fno-builtin-strftime -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -I/usr/include -fstack-protector -MT net.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/net.Tpo -c net.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/net.o net.c: In function 'net_getunixcred': net.c:731: error: storage size of 'ucred' isn't known net.c:731: warning: unused variable 'ucred' *** Error code 1
Stop in /home/daniell/dovecot/dovecot-2.2.1/src/lib (line 883 of Makefile). *** Error code 1
Stop in /home/daniell/dovecot/dovecot-2.2.1/src/lib (line 645 of Makefile). *** Error code 1
Stop in /home/daniell/dovecot/dovecot-2.2.1/src (line 390 of Makefile). *** Error code 1
Stop in /home/daniell/dovecot/dovecot-2.2.1 (line 517 of Makefile). *** Error code 1
Stop in /home/daniell/dovecot/dovecot-2.2.1 (line 350 of Makefile). ----------------------------------8<----------------------------------
Somehow configure didn't define HAVE_STRUCT_SOCKPEERCRED to 1 in config.h, but I can not untangle the autoconf magic right now.
Daniel
-- LÉVAI Dániel PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B BE4C 83B6 3A8F
On p, ápr 19, 2013 at 11:06:22 +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
On p, ápr 19, 2013 at 00:41:26 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig [...]
On OpenBSD 5.2-stable: .. and -current.
$ ./configure --disable-static --with-statedir=/var/dovecot --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
--mandir='${prefix}/man' --with-ssldir=/etc/ssl
--with-notify=kqueue --with-ioloop=kqueue --with-ssl=openssl
--without-pam --without-shadow --without-nss --without-vpopmail --with-pgsql
--with-solr --with-zlib --with-storages=maildir --with-pic
--with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local/ &&
make
The missing information from configure: [...] checking ucred.h usability... no checking ucred.h presence... no checking for ucred.h... no checking sys/ucred.h usability... no checking sys/ucred.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: proceeding with the compiler's result configure: WARNING: ## ---------------------------------- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to dovecot@dovecot.org ## configure: WARNING: ## ---------------------------------- ## checking for sys/ucred.h... no [...]
Daniel
-- LÉVAI Dániel PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B BE4C 83B6 3A8F
Hi,
inspecting the config.log file created by the configure script might be more useful to analyze the issue, than what you pasted.
Cheers Chris
Am Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:17:24 +0200 schrieb LEVAI Daniel leva@ecentrum.hu:
On p, ápr 19, 2013 at 11:06:22 +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
On p, ápr 19, 2013 at 00:41:26 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz.sig [...]
On OpenBSD 5.2-stable: .. and -current.
$ ./configure --disable-static --with-statedir=/var/dovecot --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var \ --mandir='${prefix}/man' --with-ssldir=/etc/ssl \ --with-notify=kqueue --with-ioloop=kqueue --with-ssl=openssl \ --without-pam --without-shadow --without-nss --without-vpopmail --with-pgsql \ --with-solr --with-zlib --with-storages=maildir --with-pic
--with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local/ && \ makeThe missing information from configure: [...] checking ucred.h usability... no checking ucred.h presence... no checking for ucred.h... no checking sys/ucred.h usability... no checking sys/ucred.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: proceeding with the compiler's result configure: WARNING: ## ---------------------------------- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to dovecot@dovecot.org ## configure: WARNING: ## ---------------------------------- ## checking for sys/ucred.h... no [...]
Daniel
-- Kind regards, Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Christian Wiese
Follow us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Securepoint-GmbH/132451210137395
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/SecurepointStat
Securepoint GmbH Christian Wiese Salzstr. 1 D-21335 Lueneburg http://www.securepoint.de Tele: ++49 4131 2401-0 Fax: ++49 4131 2401-50 Lueneburg HRB 1776
CONFIDENTIALITY : This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.
GEHEIMHALTUNGSPFLICHT : Dieses E-Mail und alle damit verbundenen Anlagen sind vertraulich und dürfen nur bestimmten Personen zugänglich gemacht werden. Sofern Sie nicht zu den angegebenen Empfängern gehören, benachrichtigen Sie bitte unverzüglich den Absender. Der Inhalt darf weder an Dritte weitergegeben noch zu anderen Zwecken verwendet werden. Die Informationen dürfen auch nicht auf einem Datenträger gespeichert oder auf einen Datenträger kopiert werden.
participants (15)
-
Benny Pedersen
-
Charles Marcus
-
Christian Wiese
-
Dave Gattis
-
Eray Aslan
-
LEVAI Daniel
-
Luigi Rosa
-
Marc Perkel
-
Noel Butler
-
Ralf Hildebrandt
-
Reindl Harald
-
Reuben Farrelly
-
Stephan Bosch
-
Timo Sirainen
-
Vijay Rajah