Re: Autoexpunge and special user namespace
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Timo Siraine wrote:
I'm interested in replacing my cron script that expunges old deleted mail with the new feature announced in 2.2.20
- Added mailbox { autoexpunge=<time> } setting. See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxSettings for details.
To use it, I need to specify which mailbox needs them using the namespace configuration. For example
namespace inbox { mailbox Trash { auto = no special_use = \Trash autoexpunge = 7d mailbox_list_index = yes } ...
mailbox_list_index=yes is a global setting. You can't have it here.
Oh, yes. Thanks for pointing that out. By the way, what does it do? The wiki states
mailbox_list_index=yes can help a lot by replying to IMAP STATUS
(and similar) lookups from a single index without having to open
each mailbox index separately.
So it create an uber-index that combines information from individual indices? Are there any drawback to using this?
- Do I need the special_user configuration at all? Will some clients start using different mailboxes to store deleted mail if I keep the special_use lines?
special_use is independent of the autoexpunge. I guess it wouldn't necessarily hurt.. but it's also somewhat better to have only a single \Trash mailbox so clients don't become confused when more than one of those mailboxes exist.
Got it.
Thanks, Timo.
Joseph Tam jtam.home@gmail.com
On 09 Dec 2015, at 23:51, Joseph Tam jtam.home@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Timo Siraine wrote:
- Added mailbox { autoexpunge=<time> } setting. See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxSettings for details. To use it, I need to specify which mailbox needs them using
I'm interested in replacing my cron script that expunges old deleted mail with the new feature announced in 2.2.20 the namespace configuration. For example
namespace inbox { mailbox Trash { auto = no special_use = \Trash autoexpunge = 7d mailbox_list_index = yes } ... mailbox_list_index=yes is a global setting. You can't have it here.
Oh, yes. Thanks for pointing that out. By the way, what does it do? The wiki states
mailbox_list_index=yes can help a lot by replying to IMAP STATUS (and similar) lookups from a single index without having to open each mailbox index separately.
So it create an uber-index that combines information from individual indices?
Some of the information, yes.
Are there any drawback to using this?
It's more disk I/O for keeping the new index up to date.
participants (2)
-
Joseph Tam
-
Timo Sirainen