[Dovecot] Client behaviour with sieve
Hi,
I have a working dovecot imap-server, with sieve. I find it odd that my mail-clients (Thunderbird 2 and 3) don't report anything that's new in the folders. What I mean is this : Postfix get's a mail and hands it over to dovecot's LDA and sieve moves it to a folder. When I log in with Thunderbird, I see new messages in my Inbox. But that message that was moved to a folder is "invisible" until I click on the folder. Then Thunderbird sees there are new messages in that folder and reports the number of new messages and makes the foldername bold.
Is this the expected behaviour ? Or did I configure something wrong ? Thanks for any clarification.
Regards,
Koenraad Lelong.
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:17:17 +0100 Koenraad Lelong dovecot@ace-electronics.be wrote:
Hi,
I have a working dovecot imap-server, with sieve. I find it odd that my mail-clients (Thunderbird 2 and 3) don't report anything that's new in the folders. What I mean is this : Postfix get's a mail and hands it over to dovecot's LDA and sieve moves it to a folder. When I log in with Thunderbird, I see new messages in my Inbox. But that message that was moved to a folder is "invisible" until I click on the folder. Then Thunderbird sees there are new messages in that folder and reports the number of new messages and makes the foldername bold.
Is this the expected behaviour ? Or did I configure something wrong ? Thanks for any clarification.
Regards,
Koenraad Lelong.
Take a look http://www.mozilla.org/support/thunderbird/tips#beh_downloadstartup
Nikita Koshikov schreef:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:17:17 +0100 Koenraad Lelong xxxxxx@ace-electronics.be wrote:
...
Take a look http://www.mozilla.org/support/thunderbird/tips#beh_downloadstartup
Hi Nikita, Thanks for the link.
What I don't like is that you posted my e-mail-adress in your message. Now it will be available to harvesters, and I will get spam via that address very soon. Please don't be offended, but remove that from your replies.
Regards,
Koenraad Lelong.
Hi Koenraad,
What I don't like is that you posted my e-mail-adress in your message. Now it will be available to harvesters, and I will get spam via that address very soon. Please don't be offended, but remove that from your replies. Not to a wise ass, but by posting to a list, you'll get your email published anyway. There are public archives, of which the official one uses obfuscation, but I think spam crawlers can replace " at " with an @ just fine, and dovecot.org publishes an mbox file of the entire archive. I agree that having the address in plain text in an archive is more obvious, but you'll have to accept that it will be harvested anyway, unless you're not using the address at all...
Gr.
Matthijs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the mailfolders. The INBOX and the currently selected folder are automatically monitored by all MUAs, I guess.
Dunno, if TB has a "monitor all" feature, otherwise you have to select an option in each folder's properties.
Regards,
Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBS36f+L+Vh58GPL/cAQI/1wf8CKWgqcizazSoyh7DtQpRvP59JxGU2lEt Mr9Yxalxl0BeQPAvV2/ndP/R4Gkg1VReNWRdgQh3CgLoZykVr0Mh44bidhDNtqGL 9x4QF+3otgml1iR458wjSYSdZfnMzXaQK/E03qRwX0/WaR3dVGbBod5J2y3C/n5H Re29IvhwjGcVq93zBKORARrLSVsPv2MpflW0w0nLxC/Fdmc03xvDgdX4zRMbmbXZ +nA/EhCWPVI2dOQ0lv+Z23GTTb+L0Q9TwUXBhrQn8tjju4PTtIdS8c2pKdqMJyUx LdhpCq9josq3Qsa1VI41h7vpUJ7L72mFXoQRyQase7uKQBNuf0xJMA== =Aamd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the mailfolders. The INBOX and the currently selected folder are automatically monitored by all MUAs, I guess.
Dunno, if TB has a "monitor all" feature, otherwise you have to select an option in each folder's properties.
I haven't found one so far. Next best thing would be to set it on by default and let the user turn it off but that is a Mozilla issue not Dovecot's.
\\||/ Rod
Regards,
- -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBS36f+L+Vh58GPL/cAQI/1wf8CKWgqcizazSoyh7DtQpRvP59JxGU2lEt Mr9Yxalxl0BeQPAvV2/ndP/R4Gkg1VReNWRdgQh3CgLoZykVr0Mh44bidhDNtqGL 9x4QF+3otgml1iR458wjSYSdZfnMzXaQK/E03qRwX0/WaR3dVGbBod5J2y3C/n5H Re29IvhwjGcVq93zBKORARrLSVsPv2MpflW0w0nLxC/Fdmc03xvDgdX4zRMbmbXZ +nA/EhCWPVI2dOQ0lv+Z23GTTb+L0Q9TwUXBhrQn8tjju4PTtIdS8c2pKdqMJyUx LdhpCq9josq3Qsa1VI41h7vpUJ7L72mFXoQRyQase7uKQBNuf0xJMA== =Aamd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 2010-02-19 6:33 AM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the mailfolders. The INBOX and the currently selected folder are automatically monitored by all MUAs, I guess.
Dunno, if TB has a "monitor all" feature, otherwise you have to select an option in each folder's properties.
I haven't found one so far. Next best thing would be to set it on by default and let the user turn it off but that is a Mozilla issue not Dovecot's.
\\||/ Rod
The setting you're looking for is mail.check_all_imap_folders_for_new. Set that to true and it will do what you want. I've used it once, but it seemed to cause issues with IDLE; it seemed like after checking all folders, it would IDLE on which ever folder it selected last during the check and not on the folder you were currently viewing, however that could just be me ;)
-Greg
participants (6)
-
Gregory Finch
-
Koenraad Lelong
-
Matthijs Kooijman
-
Nikita Koshikov
-
Roderick A. Anderson
-
Steffen Kaiser