Hi! Dovecot 2.2.24 Had set up solr and new schema collection. Copied dovecot provided schema. There was an error with booleans (while getting schema via http), which I "solved" by removing "add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" from solrconfig.xml. It is correct way to solve this? Anyway, I run tcpdump to see network activity between dovecot and solr: #tcpdump -i lo port 8983 and see nothing while doing: #doveadm fts rescan -u username@domain.tld no output also from doveadm.
Noticed that dovecot.index.log reapears in user mail root if deleted.
plugin { fts = solr fts_solr = url=http://localhost:8983/solr/dovecot/ debug .. }
-- KSB
On 2016.07.06. 22:51, KSB wrote:
Hi! Dovecot 2.2.24 Had set up solr and new schema collection. Copied dovecot provided schema. There was an error with booleans (while getting schema via http), which I "solved" by removing "add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" from solrconfig.xml. It is correct way to solve this? Anyway, I run tcpdump to see network activity between dovecot and solr: #tcpdump -i lo port 8983 and see nothing while doing: #doveadm fts rescan -u username@domain.tld no output also from doveadm.
Noticed that dovecot.index.log reapears in user mail root if deleted.
plugin { fts = solr fts_solr = url=http://localhost:8983/solr/dovecot/ debug .. }
-- KSB
After some fiddling around, come in to conclusion that doveadm fts rescan is nothing to do about real indexing. So, it is working. Anyway, now thinking about what really differs when fts is used vs not used. 1 argument is speed, what else?
-- KSB
On Jul 8, 2016, at 5:31 AM, KSB listeem@ksb.id.lv wrote:
1 argument is speed, what else?
Solr is built for indexing, what else do you expect?
On 2016.07.08. 4:22, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
On Jul 8, 2016, at 5:31 AM, KSB listeem@ksb.id.lv wrote:
1 argument is speed, what else?
Solr is built for indexing, what else do you expect?
Stemming for example, but it's not critical anyway, as my language doe's not have publicly available stemming dictionary/algorithm.
-- KSB
On 7/7/2016 2:31 PM, KSB wrote:
On 2016.07.06. 22:51, KSB wrote:
Hi! Dovecot 2.2.24 Had set up solr and new schema collection. Copied dovecot provided schema. There was an error with booleans (while getting schema via http), which I "solved" by removing "add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" from solrconfig.xml. It is correct way to solve this? Anyway, I run tcpdump to see network activity between dovecot and solr: #tcpdump -i lo port 8983 and see nothing while doing: #doveadm fts rescan -u username@domain.tld no output also from doveadm.
Noticed that dovecot.index.log reapears in user mail root if deleted.
plugin { fts = solr fts_solr = url=http://localhost:8983/solr/dovecot/ debug .. }
-- KSB
After some fiddling around, come in to conclusion that doveadm fts rescan is nothing to do about real indexing. So, it is working. Anyway, now thinking about what really differs when fts is used vs not used. 1 argument is speed, what else?
-- KSB "doveadm fts rescan" resets pointers but does not itself trigger a re-index. But it makes the next actual index scan the full mailbox.
The whole point of FTS is "full-text-search". So if you don't use it - you don't need it. But when large mailboxes are involved, searches involving solr indexes are extremely fast compared to non-fts searches.
-- Daniel
participants (3)
-
Daniel Miller
-
KSB
-
Zhang Huangbin