dovecot runs on a pbl listed ip ?
X-Spam-Report: * 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL * [52.178.156.48 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] * 3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica" * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Received: from talvi.dovecot.org (unknown [52.178.156.48]) by wursti.dovecot.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:27:22 +0200 (CEST)
sorry if its not just me :(
make sure all wan ips is in trusted-networks / internal-networks atleast in spamassassin
who will make a bug for replica ? :=)
On July 31, 2016 at 4:04 PM Benny Pedersen me@junc.eu wrote:
X-Spam-Report:
- 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[52.178.156.48 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
- 3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica"
- -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
- -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
- 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
- -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
- 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Received: from talvi.dovecot.org (unknown [52.178.156.48]) by wursti.dovecot.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:27:22 +0200 (CEST)
sorry if its not just me :(
make sure all wan ips is in trusted-networks / internal-networks atleast in spamassassin
who will make a bug for replica ? :=)
We'll have a look.
Aki
participants (2)
-
aki.tuomi@dovecot.fi
-
Benny Pedersen