Hi,
i'm new on sieve, but want to use ist with sogo.
The Problem is, that when i set a redirect or vacation rule like: redirect "email@example.com"; (real Adress is different) the sieve says the mail would be forwarded, but no mail is sent. (No Action in /var/log/maillog) And because there is no Error-Message it's difficult to search for...
Dovecot log
Jan 28 10:53:46 lda(ptest@pilarkto.com): Debug: sieve: using sieve path for user's script: /var/mail/vhosts/test/.dovecot.sieve Jan 28 10:53:46 lda(ptest@pilarkto.com): Debug: sieve: opening script /var/mail/vhosts/test/.dovecot.sieve Jan 28 10:53:46 lda(ptest@pilarkto.com): Debug: sieve: script binary /var/mail/vhosts/test/.dovecot.svbin successfully loaded Jan 28 10:53:46 lda(ptest@pilarkto.com): Debug: sieve: binary save: not saving binary /var/mail/vhosts/test/.dovecot.svbin, because it is already stored Jan 28 10:53:46 lda(ptest@pilarkto.com): Debug: sieve: executing script from /var/mail/vhosts/test/.dovecot.svbin Jan 28 10:53:46 lda(ptest@pilarkto.com): Info: sieve: msgid=<4D429227.3000004@pilarkto.net>: forwarded to <email@example.com>
Everything else works fine, except the program "mail". I dont know if there is a coherence but a typical Mailserver-Test "date|mail -s test email@example.com" also don't sent a message to postfix.
I hope you will held me out or even say me, if this is a bug or a misconfiguration.
thanks a lot Philipp
- Philipp v. Strobl-Albeg <philipp@pilarkto.net>:
Everything else works fine, except the program "mail". I dont know if there is a coherence but a typical Mailserver-Test "date|mail -s test email@example.com" also don't sent a message to postfix.
find / -name sendmail
what is the output?
-- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Am 28.01.2011 11:03, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
- Philipp v. Strobl-Albeg<philipp@pilarkto.net>:
Everything else works fine, except the program "mail". I dont know if there is a coherence but a typical Mailserver-Test "date|mail -s test email@example.com" also don't sent a message to postfix. find / -name sendmail
what is the output?
find / -name sendmail Output:
/etc/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/blue-theme/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/caldera/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/mscstyle3/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail
- Philipp v. Strobl-Albeg <philipp@pilarkto.net>:
/usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail
diff /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail find out which one is the correct one :)
-- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Am 28.01.2011 11:10, schrieb Philipp v. Strobl-Albeg:
Am 28.01.2011 11:03, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
- Philipp v. Strobl-Albeg<philipp@pilarkto.net>:
Everything else works fine, except the program "mail". I dont know if there is a coherence but a typical Mailserver-Test "date|mail -s test email@example.com" also don't sent a message to postfix. find / -name sendmail
what is the output?
find / -name sendmail Output:
/etc/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/blue-theme/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/caldera/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/mscstyle3/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail
Try
echo "Subject: Test" | /usr/sbin/sendmail email@example.com
and watch your sendmail log.
- Holger Mauermann <holger@mauermann.org>:
find / -name sendmail Output:
/etc/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/blue-theme/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/caldera/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/mscstyle3/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail
Try
echo "Subject: Test" | /usr/sbin/sendmail email@example.com
and watch your sendmail log.
And of course: echo "Subject: Test" | /usr/lib/sendmail email@example.com
one of the two will be the right one.
Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Hi,
thank you for all of your quick response.
diff of the binaries brought nothing, because they are the same. Both are symlinks to sendmail.postfix
ll /usr/sbin/sendmail lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Apr 16 2010 /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /etc/alternatives/mta
ll /usr/lib/sendmail lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Apr 16 2010 /usr/lib/sendmail -> /etc/alternatives/mta-sendmail
ll /etc/alternatives/mta* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta -> /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-aliasesman -> /usr/share/man/man5/aliases.postfix.5.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-mailq -> /usr/bin/mailq.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-mailqman -> /usr/share/man/man1/mailq.postfix.1.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-newaliases -> /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-newaliasesman -> /usr/share/man/man1/newaliases.postfix.1.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-pam -> /etc/pam.d/smtp.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-rmail -> /usr/bin/rmail.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-sendmail -> /usr/lib/sendmail.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-sendmailman -> /usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.postfix.1.gz
The sendmail test-message (with parameter -vv) brings: postdrop: fifo_trigger: open public/pickup: cannot open file: No such device or address
This error also appear by executing "postqueue -f". but i can not see where
ll /var/spool/postfix/public/ total 20K srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 28 18:49 cleanup srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 28 18:49 flush prw--w--w- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 23 17:55 pickup prw--w--w- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 28 19:05 qmgr srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 28 18:49 showq
and ll /var/spool/postfix/ total 140K drwx------ 2 postfix root 12K Jan 28 19:05 active drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Jan 28 13:23 bounce drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Aug 14 2008 corrupt drwx------ 18 postfix root 4.0K Apr 22 2010 defer drwx------ 18 postfix root 4.0K Apr 22 2010 deferred drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Apr 22 2010 flush drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Aug 14 2008 hold drwx------ 2 postfix root 12K Jan 28 19:05 incoming drwx-wx--- 2 postfix postdrop 4.0K Jan 28 19:00 maildrop drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Jan 23 18:03 pid drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Jan 28 18:49 private drwx--x--- 2 postfix postdrop 4.0K Jan 28 18:49 public drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Aug 14 2008 saved -rw------- 1 root root 8.0K Jan 28 18:51 smtp_scache.db drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Aug 14 2008 trace
So root has not the ability to access the public-folder. Is that normal for postfix-2.3.3 ?
Perhaps same users (dovecot, root ...) has to be in the postdrop group, but what is about the security with that issue ?
Kindly regards and many thanks Philipp
Am 28.01.2011 11:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
- Holger Mauermann<holger@mauermann.org>:
find / -name sendmail Output:
/etc/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/blue-theme/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/caldera/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/mscstyle3/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail Try
echo "Subject: Test" | /usr/sbin/sendmail email@example.com
and watch your sendmail log. And of course: echo "Subject: Test" | /usr/lib/sendmail email@example.com
one of the two will be the right one.
-- Philipp v. Strobl-Albeg
- PILAKRTO NETWORKS -
Mobil +49 151 270 39710
Hi,
the trick was the "pickup" service in the postfix/master.cf
For some unknown reason this line was deleted. Now with:
pickup fifo n - - 60 1 pickup
everythink works perfectly now. (even the sieve delivery)
Thanks a lot again and have fun with Open Source
Philipp
Am 28.01.2011 19:10, schrieb Philipp Strobl:
Hi,
thank you for all of your quick response.
diff of the binaries brought nothing, because they are the same. Both are symlinks to sendmail.postfix
ll /usr/sbin/sendmail lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Apr 16 2010 /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /etc/alternatives/mta
ll /usr/lib/sendmail lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Apr 16 2010 /usr/lib/sendmail -> /etc/alternatives/mta-sendmail
ll /etc/alternatives/mta* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta -> /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-aliasesman -> /usr/share/man/man5/aliases.postfix.5.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-mailq -> /usr/bin/mailq.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-mailqman -> /usr/share/man/man1/mailq.postfix.1.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-newaliases -> /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-newaliasesman -> /usr/share/man/man1/newaliases.postfix.1.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-pam -> /etc/pam.d/smtp.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-rmail -> /usr/bin/rmail.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-sendmail -> /usr/lib/sendmail.postfix lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 Apr 17 2010 /etc/alternatives/mta-sendmailman -> /usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.postfix.1.gz
The sendmail test-message (with parameter -vv) brings: postdrop: fifo_trigger: open public/pickup: cannot open file: No such device or address
This error also appear by executing "postqueue -f". but i can not see where
ll /var/spool/postfix/public/ total 20K srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 28 18:49 cleanup srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 28 18:49 flush prw--w--w- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 23 17:55 pickup prw--w--w- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 28 19:05 qmgr srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 28 18:49 showq
and ll /var/spool/postfix/ total 140K drwx------ 2 postfix root 12K Jan 28 19:05 active drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Jan 28 13:23 bounce drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Aug 14 2008 corrupt drwx------ 18 postfix root 4.0K Apr 22 2010 defer drwx------ 18 postfix root 4.0K Apr 22 2010 deferred drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Apr 22 2010 flush drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Aug 14 2008 hold drwx------ 2 postfix root 12K Jan 28 19:05 incoming drwx-wx--- 2 postfix postdrop 4.0K Jan 28 19:00 maildrop drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Jan 23 18:03 pid drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Jan 28 18:49 private drwx--x--- 2 postfix postdrop 4.0K Jan 28 18:49 public drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Aug 14 2008 saved -rw------- 1 root root 8.0K Jan 28 18:51 smtp_scache.db drwx------ 2 postfix root 4.0K Aug 14 2008 trace
So root has not the ability to access the public-folder. Is that normal for postfix-2.3.3 ?
Perhaps same users (dovecot, root ...) has to be in the postdrop group, but what is about the security with that issue ?
Kindly regards and many thanks Philipp
Am 28.01.2011 11:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
- Holger Mauermann<holger@mauermann.org>:
find / -name sendmail Output:
/etc/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/blue-theme/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/caldera/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/sendmail /usr/libexec/webmin/mscstyle3/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail Try
echo "Subject: Test" | /usr/sbin/sendmail email@example.com
and watch your sendmail log. And of course: echo "Subject: Test" | /usr/lib/sendmail email@example.com
one of the two will be the right one.
-- Philipp v. Strobl-Albeg
- PILAKRTO NETWORKS -
Mobil +49 151 270 39710
participants (4)
-
Holger Mauermann
-
Philipp Strobl
-
Philipp v. Strobl-Albeg
-
Ralf Hildebrandt