Just gathered the patches in dovecot.org/patches/ and a few more that I think have been sent to this list before. If there's anything missing, please tell.
- Fix memory leaks in LDAP, MySQL and PGSQL userdb/passdb
- Fix hanging when parsing mails that have over 4096 bytes in one
line (SMTP servers normally don't allow over 1000 bytes so it
shouldn't be much of a problem)
- FETCH BODYSTRUCTURE sometimes giving a wrong reply
(eg. with FETCH (BODYSTRUCTURE RFC822.SIZE) if it wasn't cached)
- Never return more than one INBOX in LIST even if there are such
files. They don't work anyway and it just confuses clients.
- mbox: Don't allow creating INBOX directory by creating/renaming
mailboxes under it. They just wouldn't work.
- POP3: Don't return PLAIN in SASL list. We don't support initial SASL
responses, so it only breaks with most clients that try to use it.
Timo,
On 11/30/2004 5:40 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Just gathered the patches in dovecot.org/patches/ and a few more that I think have been sent to this list before. If there's anything missing, please tell.
Since it looks like you're gearing up for a .99 series release, if there were a patch for the bug that causes mbox headers not to match the message bodies, would you consider including it?
And the bug that causes duplicate message headers in Thunderbird (and possibly other clients)?
What is your timeframe for releasing?
On 30.11.2004, at 18:25, Matt McClure wrote:
Since it looks like you're gearing up for a .99 series release, if there were a patch for the bug that causes mbox headers not to match the message bodies, would you consider including it?
I'm not really sure what you mean by this.
And the bug that causes duplicate message headers in Thunderbird (and possibly other clients)?
I don't remember hearing about this either.
What is your timeframe for releasing?
"Soon".
Timo,
Sorry for being so vague.
On 12/2/2004 10:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 30.11.2004, at 18:25, Matt McClure wrote:
Since it looks like you're gearing up for a .99 series release, if there were a patch for the bug that causes mbox headers not to match the message bodies, would you consider including it?
I'm not really sure what you mean by this.
And the bug that causes duplicate message headers in Thunderbird (and possibly other clients)?
I don't remember hearing about this either.
Both are described here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209561
I'm convinced it's not a Thunderbird bug, especially because users of our dovecot server see mismatched headers/content in Squirrelmail also.
There was also a brief discussion of the issue on 9/12-13 on this list with the subject "duplicate message headers in Thunderbird with dovecot server".
Is it worth me spending any time trying to fix it, or will I not be in time for 0.99.12?
--On Friday, December 03, 2004 10:43 AM -0500 Matt McClure mlm@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Both are described here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209561
On a related note, I've been seeing an intermittent problem with the wrong message structure reported, and no attachment showing up. Using client-side protocol logging in Mulberry, it looks like Dovecot is reporting the wrong structure, with just a single text/plain component. But it's been impossible to track down, as I can close the folder and return a few minutes later and the correct structure is reported.
The server version on both servers I use, and which both exhibit the issue:
dovecot-0.99.10.9-1.FC3.2
On 4.12.2004, at 04:37, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On a related note, I've been seeing an intermittent problem with the wrong message structure reported, and no attachment showing up. Using client-side protocol logging in Mulberry, it looks like Dovecot is reporting the wrong structure, with just a single text/plain component. But it's been impossible to track down, as I can close the folder and return a few minutes later and the correct structure is reported.
This is most likely one of the bugs 0.99.12 fixes.
On 3.12.2004, at 17:43, Matt McClure wrote:
And the bug that causes duplicate message headers in Thunderbird (and possibly other clients)?
I don't remember hearing about this either.
Both are described here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209561
So this problem was about X-UID header changing constantly. This doesn't happen with most people, so it's somehow specific to your system.
In any case I don't really want to waste time debugging something I've already rewritten completely in 1.0-tests. Now if I only could get it stabilized faster :)
participants (3)
-
Kenneth Porter
-
Matt McClure
-
Timo Sirainen