[Dovecot] gnutls support
Other than license issues, is there an advantage to using gnutls vs openssl? Or is openssl superior - at least in the current implementations?
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:25 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Other than license issues, is there an advantage to using gnutls vs openssl? Or is openssl superior - at least in the current implementations?
Dovecot's GNUTLS support was written long time ago and its API has changed since. It doesn't work. But a working GNUTLS support would still be nice some day. I don't much like OpenSSL.
On 9/16/2010 5:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:25 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Other than license issues, is there an advantage to using gnutls vs openssl? Or is openssl superior - at least in the current implementations?
Dovecot's GNUTLS support was written long time ago and its API has changed since. It doesn't work. But a working GNUTLS support would still be nice some day. I don't much like OpenSSL.
With 2.1.7 - is GNUTLS supported?
On 12.6.2012, at 21.56, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 9/16/2010 5:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:25 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Other than license issues, is there an advantage to using gnutls vs openssl? Or is openssl superior - at least in the current implementations?
Dovecot's GNUTLS support was written long time ago and its API has changed since. It doesn't work. But a working GNUTLS support would still be nice some day. I don't much like OpenSSL.
With 2.1.7 - is GNUTLS supported?
No, and I have no plans to add it. But I don't mind if someone sends a patch.
participants (2)
-
Daniel L. Miller
-
Timo Sirainen