So if i understand this fully, you must define ALL potentional aliases which user is member of ?

When create new alias alias1@domain.tld and it is alias for user@domain.tld i must edit vacation script and add :address "alias1@domain.tld" ? If yes, is little stupid and unmaintainable. Can be used some wildcard * or something similar ?

2010/2/12 Martin F. Foster martin_foster@pacific.net.au:

Following from Steffen Kaiser's response, RFC5230 explains the conditions necessary for the Sieve Vacation extension to trigger a response. This says:

"Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's email address is in a "To", "Cc", "Bcc", "Resent-To", "Resent-Cc", or "Resent-Bcc" line of the original message.

So your scenario 4 happens when the sender is only in the envelope, and not in the headers.

For example: this transaction will get a response because the mailbox address is in the To: header

ehlo there.com mail from: dude@there.com rcpt to: user@domain.tld << envelope recipient, mailsystem routes with this information data To: "Some User" user@domain.tld << header recipient must be correlated for Sieve Vacation to send a response From: "Dude" dude@there.com Subject: message

Hi there .

This transaction will not get a response, and will trigger the "discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered to user@domain.tld " log:

ehlo there.com mail from: dude@there.com rcpt to: user@domain.tld data Subject: message

Hi there .

Cheers,

-Martin Foster

Le 12-Feb-10 21:00, dovecot-request@dovecot.org a écrit :

...

Message: 9 Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:18:23 +0100 From: Lampalampacz@gmail.com Subject: [Dovecot] sieve vacation To: Dovecot Mailing Listdovecot@dovecot.org Message-ID:        9aef75b11002120018v69f185b5hb0a9e0f7dad1e5c5@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello,

scenario:

OK 1. created vacation script (see below) OK 2. send message fromuser@anotherdomain.tld  touser@domain.tld  => got auto vacation response (2010-02-11T19:42:13) OK 3. send message fromuser@anotherdomain.tld  touser@domain.tld  => no response (is ok because ":days 1" settings) (2010-02-11T19:47:46) BAD 4. send message fromanotheruser@anotherdomain.tld  to user@domain.tld  =>  no response (2010-02-11T19:48:04)

Why is discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered touser@domain.tld  ?

log: 2010-02-11T19:42:13.669321+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=052a01caab49$ec4752e0$c4d5f8a0$@tld: sent vacation response to user@anotherdomain.tld 2010-02-11T19:42:13.732541+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=052a01caab49$ec4752e0$c4d5f8a0$@tld: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' 2010-02-11T19:47:46.271534+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=053201caab4a$b295ece0$17c1c6a0$@tld: discarded duplicate vacation response touser@anotherdomain.tld 2010-02-11T19:47:46.275891+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=053201caab4a$b295ece0$17c1c6a0$@tld: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' 2010-02-11T19:48:04.958622+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=053701caab4a$bda90220$38fb0660$@tld: discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered touser@domain.tld 2010-02-11T19:48:04.965875+01:00 hermes dovecot: deliver(user@domain.tld): sieve: msgid=053701caab4a$bda90220$38fb0660$@tld: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX'

vacation script:

require "vacation";

vacation :days 1 :subject "Auto reply"

"auto reply message";

Thank you -- Lampa ------------------------------