[Dovecot] Debian dovecot news
I uploaded 0.99.10.6 to sid. Owing to the importance of the dot lock fix, I've tried to have this pushed to sarge quickly. Let's see how that goes.
I've prepared a backport of 0.99.10.6 to woody which should be showing up on www.backports.org soon hopefully. In the meantime, if you desperately need it and don't mind working out dependencies yourself, you can find it at http://www.braincells.com/backports/
I uploaded 1.0test18 to http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/ (I'll do test20 tomorrow)
I told Timo I'd port dovecot's gnutls support from gnutls7 to gnutls10 but I have absolutely no time for it so if someone would volunteer, contact me, I'd really appreciate it.
Le 06/20/2004 07:44 AM, Jaldhar H. Vyas a écrit :
I uploaded 1.0test18 to http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/ (I'll do test20 tomorrow)
Hi,
Have you got any advice on upgrading from 0.99 to 1.0-test on a sarge ? Any particular configuration options to change ? Is it safe to let the old indexes ?
thanx
Nico Notre repentir n'est pas tant un regret du mal que nous avons fait, qu'une crainte de celui qui nous en peut arriver. -+- François de La Rochefoucauld (1613-1680), Maximes 180 -+-
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
Hi,
Have you got any advice on upgrading from 0.99 to 1.0-test on a sarge ? Any particular configuration options to change ? Is it safe to let the old indexes ?
I was hoping you would tell me. ;-)
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
Have you got any advice on upgrading from 0.99 to 1.0-test on a sarge ? Any particular configuration options to change ? Is it safe to let the old indexes ?
I was hoping you would tell me. ;-)
I will, but with at least test22 :)
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
I was hoping you would tell me. ;-)
I will, but with at least test22 :)
Well here you are then: http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/
Le 06/23/2004 09:04 PM, Jaldhar H. Vyas a écrit :
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
I was hoping you would tell me. ;-)
I will, but with at least test22 :)
Well here you are then: http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/
Well, it's impressive, great job Timo ! And thanks Jaldhar for the .debs.
What can I say, It works right out of the box, and it's damn fast. I had no problem for the installation, just wiped out the old config file and replaced it with the new one, changed 3 params and that was it. Nothing less, nothing more, it took me 3 minutes to be the proud owner of a new dovecot 1.0-test22 server ;)
And it's really fast, I tryed to stress it a little bit with 30.000 mails mboxes, erasing indexes, etc... There is no garbage in the logs.
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:04:48 -0400 (EDT) "Jaldhar H. Vyas" jaldhar@debian.org wrote:
Well here you are then: http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/
I'm trying to build (from your source packages) dovecot for installation on a Woody system. The only gotcha that I've found is that your package calls for libpam-runtime >= 0.76-13.1; however, Woody has libpam-runtime 0.72-35. Is there any special reason for needing this version to your knowledge?
Thanks, Keith
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, Keith Edmunds wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:04:48 -0400 (EDT) "Jaldhar H. Vyas" jaldhar@debian.org wrote:
Well here you are then: http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/
I'm trying to build (from your source packages) dovecot for installation on a Woody system. The only gotcha that I've found is that your package calls for libpam-runtime >= 0.76-13.1; however, Woody has libpam-runtime 0.72-35. Is there any special reason for needing this version to your knowledge?
It's because of the /etc/pam.d/common-* stuff that's standard in sarge+. You can safely remove use earlier versions of libpam-runtime but you might need to adjust /etc/pam.d/dovecot afterwards.
participants (4)
-
Jaldhar H. Vyas
-
Keith Edmunds
-
Nicolas STRANSKY
-
Nicolas STRANSKY