[Dovecot] 1.0-test58

[Timo Sirainen]

On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 13:56 +0300, Andrey Panin wrote:
> > POP3 code shouldn't either assume that ':' and everything after it
> > should be removed. Hmm. Perhaps just use a different name than
> > MAIL_FETCH_FILE_NAME. But there's not much point in having a
> > maildir-specific MAIL_FETCH_BASE_FILE_NAME either. Maybe
> > MAIL_FETCH_SPECIAL_UIDL?
> 
> I vote for MAIL_FETCH_SPECIAL_UIDL. Does attached patch looks better ?

Actually getting the file name wouldn't probably be all that useful
since if you're accessing it directly you'll need the code to find it
again if it's name is changed. So it's probably better just to use some
of the maildir-specific functions directly..

I think I got it: MAIL_FETCH_UIDL_FILE_NAME. :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041219/32e7bafb/attachment-0001.bin>