[Dovecot] writing an MDA, help me avoid corrupted indexes
Lee Howard
faxguy at howardsilvan.com
Wed Dec 14 21:52:59 EET 2005
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 10:03 -0800, Lee Howard wrote:
>
>
>>Curtis Maloney wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Have you checked out Dovecot's own LDA?
>>>
>>>
>>No, but I just did, and it looks like exactly what I need... except that
>>it doesn't support passwd-file auth. Or am I missing that?
>>
>>
>
>It uses dovecot-auth directly, so you don't have to configure users for
>the LDA separately.
>
>
I'm was trying to follow the instructions here:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/LDA
I didn't realize that I had to create a "socket listen" in auth
default... I was trying to use the other "socket listen" instances that
are found in the example config for other uses.
Once I got that sorted out I got the socket fine. But because
permissions wouldn't allow it, I had to put the socket somewhere other
than /var/run/dovecot/auth-master, and that was easy enough with
dovecot.conf, but the dovecot-deliver.conf file shown on the Wiki
indicates an auth_socket_path option which doesn't seem to have an
effect. I had to look at the code to see that it's modified with the -a
option now.
Okay, so that's now all sorted out on this end. My own LDA now uses
Dovecot deliver, and it works well... I don't seem to have the problems
that I had just sticking the mail file into the maildir new directory on
my own.
If I could offer a suggestion here it would be to get some more accurate
documentation out there for deliver... even if it is just runtime
"--help" or some such messages.
>As long as the filenames are always unique (eg. inode numbers get
>reused), there should be no problem. Dovecot doesn't require any index
>updates either from MDA.
>
This certainly doesn't appear to be the case.
> What errors are you getting?
>
>
Well, I'm not getting those errors any more because I'm using Dovecot
deliver ;-)
However, when I was just sticking the files into the maildir new
directory "by hand" (yes, they used unique filenames)...
With the dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2 binary installation I was getting
"Corrupted index file" errors pointing at the .imap.index file in the
maildir and with a "Fixed duplicate" error message the mail would get
moved to the cur directory and the POP3 client would never download it.
With the 1.0alpha5 tarball installation that I performed (after
uninsalling the binary RPM installation) I didn't get the "Corrupted
index file" messages, but I did get the "Fixed duplicate" messages, and
the mail would still get moved to the cur directory.
Having now installed both 0.99 and 1.0alpha I can see obvious
improvements in the newer version. However, admittedly I found 0.99
less complicated to configure than 1.0alpha. I think that the
formatting of the config file is a bit too programmer-esque and would be
more user-friendly with context-style (.ini) entries like this:
[auth default]
passdb = passwd-file
passwd-file-path = /usr/local/etc/dovecot-users
.......
[pop3]
uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv
......
In any case, thank you for all that you do. Dovecot is a wonderfully
better than Cyrus from an installation and maintenance perspective.
Lee.
More information about the dovecot
mailing list