[Dovecot] Re: assertion failed -0.99 -> 1.0-stable

[Timo Sirainen]

On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 12:17 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:02:39PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:19:31PM +0000, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> > 
> > > 1.0-stables don't handle
> > > them well yet. 
> 
> Why provide the 'mail_save_crlf' option then ?
> Granted it's there for performance sake, but can I conclude from what
> you're saying that it should not be triggered to 'yes' (which is not
> my case by the way) in 1.0-stables ?

I think mail_save_crlf with mbox writes CRs only to message's body, not
headers. The problem is only with parsing headers correctly (or maybe
it's only CR after From-line.. well, maybe I should look into it and try
to fix it finally).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20050614/7a58c070/attachment.pgp