[Dovecot] Re: assertion failed -0.99 -> 1.0-stable

[Thomas Hummel]

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:02:39PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:19:31PM +0000, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> 
> > 1.0-stables don't handle
> > them well yet. 

Why provide the 'mail_save_crlf' option then ?
Granted it's there for performance sake, but can I conclude from what
you're saying that it should not be triggered to 'yes' (which is not
my case by the way) in 1.0-stables ?

-- 
Thomas Hummel 	    | Institut Pasteur
<hummel at pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau