[Dovecot] Re: Dovecot stable slow

[Timo Sirainen]

On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 01:41 -0700, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> Linux 2.4 kernel on redhat 9 using reiserfs on all partitions with raid1
> on 2 100 gig 7200 rpm wd drives.  P4 2.4G  800Mhz FSB w/HT but HT has
> been recently turned off do to the vulnerability in it.  Also 1G DDR
> 2700 ram.  It's pretty close to the example config file so that option
> is turned off.  I could try enabling it, but I am currently running
> 0.99.x, with it's own default config modified slightly, but it that
> option is still disabled and runs just fine so I don't think that is the
> slow part.  Some difference between stable and 0.99.x seems to cause the
> slowdown.  I could compare the two config files, but I think it's a
> difference in implementation rather than a different configuration.

How much slower is 1.0-stable, when moving how many messages and how
large the source and destination mailboxes are? I can't really think of
any difference that would make 0.99.x faster, so there could be some bug
but I'm not seeing it in my tests here.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20050614/6b7f86df/attachment-0001.bin>