[Dovecot] 1.0.beta6 released
Timo Sirainen
tss at iki.fi
Wed Apr 12 20:03:25 EEST 2006
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:58 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> I think it depends a bit on how big the upgrade was as well. If the
> dovecot index format hasn't changed, then you're probably OK letting
> older imap processes carry on for a bit (minus logging). If the indexes
> *have* changed then you run the risk of a second imap connection opening
> the same folder (e.g. to move messages) and the two versions getting
> into a rebuild war over the indexes.
I don't think the index file format has changed for many months now, and
I'm not planning on changing it anymore before v2.0 (at least in
incompatible ways).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20060412/e372405d/attachment.pgp
More information about the dovecot
mailing list