[Dovecot] My view on 1.0 release and version numbering

[Timo Sirainen]

On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 10:07 -0700, Mark Nienberg wrote:
> Of course you can do whatever you want, and whatever you do I will appreciate it, but 
> I wonder if the Release Candidate stage is the right time to be rewriting sections of 
> the code that already seem to work.  Maybe you should have a stable fork and a 
> testing fork of the code and try out new stuff in the testing fork?  The stable fork 
> would be nothing but bugfixes at this point.

That's pretty much how it is now. The reason for the rewrite was that
the old code didn't work perfectly either (occational hangs), and I
wanted to fix that before v1.0.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20060730/47b7ee64/attachment.pgp