[Dovecot] patch: list shared namespace
tss at iki.fi
Fri Nov 7 15:48:19 EET 2008
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:33 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> What I'm worrying here is if all users have shared something. For
> example how does this work with global ACLs? IIRC if there's a global
> ACL for e.g. "Spam", Dovecot will create dovecot-acl-list with "Spam" in
> it for all users. Even without global ACLs the number of users sharing
> something might be a bit too large.
> So the performance would be a lot better if the dict stored something
> like source_user -> dest, where dest would be all the user names and
> group names that are included in the user's ACLs (for any mailbox). Then
> you'd look only at those users' mailboxes where you or your groups are
> mentioned. Negative user/group rules perhaps shouldn't be in the dict.
Maybe something like:
Dict contains /acl/$dest/$source_user -> 1 where $dest is either the ACL
user or ACL group (with u= and g= prefixes so they don't get mixed) and
$source_user is the user whose mailbox ACL is being changed.
This allows getting a list of all possible users whose shared mailboxes
we have visible. Just do a dict iteration for /acl/$user and /acl/$group
for each group we belong to. And I guess also check /acl/anyone
As for updating the dict, it should normally be done by
acl_backend_vfile_object_update(). It should also immediately update the
dovecot-acl-list file. This should take care of all the ACL changes that
are done via IMAP. The dict changes are single entry updates or
deletions, no iterations, so the IMAP ACL commands are relatively cheap
Changing dovecot-acl files by hand then requires dropping removed
users/groups from the dict. Since we don't know anymore what was
removed, we have to go through the entire dict and find all the entries
with /acl/*/$source_user. Then add the missing entries and delete the
unnecessary entries. Triggering this rescan could be done by
acl_backend_vfile_acllist_verify() when it's also rebuilding the
Then there's a final problem of how to rebuild the dict in case it gets
broken, desynced or whatever. I think this would be solved most easily
with an increasing acl-validity value (UNIX timestamp). In dict store it
to /acl/validity and in each dovecot-acl-list store it to its header
(which doesn't exist yet, need to add it). When reading or updating
dovecot-acl-list file check if its acl-validity value is different from
dict's /acl/validity value. If it is, trigger a dictionary rescan.
I think it should rescan only the one user whose dovecot-acl-list is
being read (so the code would be identical to handling changed
dovecot-acl files), because it might take too long to rescan all users'
ACL files. This means anyway that deleting everything from dictionary
would cause shared mailboxes to be lost from LIST until either the
dovecot-acl-list is being read by either a) the owning user logging in
and issuing a LIST command, b) the destination users having those
mailboxes subscribed and issuing a LSUB command.
Any hope of getting you to implement at least parts of this? :) Also the
IMAP ACL code needs to be moved to a separate imap-acl plugin. After
those two I could start trying to get all of it merged.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20081107/cb88c65f/attachment.bin
More information about the dovecot