[Dovecot] Corrupted index cache file issues (Corrupted physical size)

[Timo Sirainen]

On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:11 +0400, Max Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > Dovecot never modifies the S= field, even when it notices that it's wrong.
> > So it's your LDA that writes them wrong.
> 
> Is it ok to rename all files deleting S= and W= fields

This gives new UIDs to the messages. But that's better than not being
able to access them at all :)

>  if no keywords was used?

There's no difference with or without keywords.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090621/f2348804/attachment-0001.bin