[Dovecot] Dovecot design-question
tss at iki.fi
Sat Feb 6 20:16:57 EET 2010
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:19 +0100, Werner wrote:
> > - It's probably the best idea to direct SMTP and POP/IMAP always to
> > the same server behind the loadbalancer (because dovecot-deliver is
> > used which updates indexes?)
> like mentioned on the website, but "would it be possible without nasty
> errors" ?
If both servers access index files at the same time, it's going to cause
> > - If we think of a "active/passive" setup: dovecot index-files locally
> > or on the nfs-share?
> what's the better approach here?
active/passive is guaranteed to work at least. Or any setup where a
user's indexes aren't accessed at the same time by two machines.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20100206/92c202be/attachment.bin
More information about the dovecot