[Dovecot] sieve problem email silently discard
ml at smtp.fakessh.eu
ml at smtp.fakessh.eu
Mon Jul 4 15:19:27 EEST 2011
Le lundi 4 juillet 2011 00:40, ml at smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
> Le dimanche 3 juillet 2011 23:57, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
> > On 07/03/2011 10:22 PM, ml at smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
> > > I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve
> > > script is silently discard
> > > after delivery but never returned to the inbox
> > >
> > > all testimonials are welcome
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > plugin {
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > plugin = $mail_plugins autocreate managesieve sieve
> > > sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve
> > > sieve_before = /var/sieve-scripts/roundcube.sieve
> > > sieve_dir = ~/sieve
> > > sieve_global_path = whatever
> > > }
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > egrep lda /var/Log/maillog
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > 2011-07-03 19:47:15lda(fakessh): Debug: sieve: executed before user's
> > > script(1): /var/sieve-scripts/roundcube.sieve
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > 2011-07-03 19:47:15lda(fakessh): Debug: sieve: executing script
> > > from /var/sieve-scripts/roundcube.svbin
> > > 2011-07-03 19:47:15lda(fakessh): Info: sieve:
> > > msgid=<6EBEE5FC-62B1-4C73-B26E-DEBFD6E26DB6 at shorewall.net>: marked
> > > message to be discarded if not explicitly delivered (discard action)
> >
> > I would not call this a silent discard: it is reported in the log above.
> > Also, the contents of roundcube.sieve that you showed in an earlier
> > thread contained a single discard action, which is therefore the only
> > likely culprit. Now the question boils down to: why is this discard
> > action triggered? The interesting part of the script is the following:
> >
> > require ["comparator-i;ascii-numeric","relational"];
> > if header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
> > ["X-Spam-score"]["500"]
> > {
> > discard;
> > stop;
> > }
> >
> > Since the message is discarded, it will most likely be impossible to
> > retrieve that message and check why it fires this rule. The relatively
> > innocent situation would be that your Spam filter truly produces this
> > interesting score of > 500. A less innocent case would be a bug in the
> > Sieve interpreter. Either way, we need to have access to one of those
> > messages that triggers this rule and gets discarded without apparent
> > reason.
> >
> > My suggestion is to replace that `discard;' action with a `fileinto
> >
> > :create "Debug";' action (:create creates the folder implicitly; depends
> >
> > on mailbox extension require) to file messages that would normally be
> > discarded into a special folder for later evaluation. Alternatively, you
> > can redirect such messages to a special mail account.
> >
> > Only then can we trace this problem any deeper.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Stephan.
>
> thanks Stephan
>
> I just change my sieve script by removing the implicit discard
> a fileinto :create "Junk.spam.spam"
>
>
> until next time
Hi Stephan
it just happened a mail that was issued in INBOX.spam.spam
supposedly a hit with spam than 500
which does not appear in the body of the mail here
Return-Path: <bar-return-176164-ml=smtp.fakessh.eu at ml.ovh.net>
X-Original-To: fakessh at localhost.r13151.ovh.net
Delivered-To: fakessh at localhost.r13151.ovh.net
Received: from r13151.ovh.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by r13151.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2C3CC08C
for <fakessh at localhost.r13151.ovh.net>; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:15:22 +0200
(CEST)
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v1.0.0 r13151.ovh.net BC2C3CC08C
Authentication-Results: r13151.ovh.net; sender-id=none
header.from=mihamina@***tmb.org; spf=none
smtp.mfrom=bar-return-176164-ml=smtp.fakessh.eu at ml.ovh.net
Received-SPF: none (ml.ovh.net: No applicable sender policy available)
receiver=r13151.ovh.net; identity=mailfrom;
envelope-from="bar-return-176164-ml=smtp.fakessh.eu at ml.ovh.net";
helo=67.mail-out.ovh.net; client-ip=91.121.***.68
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v1.0.0 r13151.ovh.net C0199CC08B
Authentication-Results: r13151.ovh.net; sender-id=none
header.from=mihamina@***tmb.org; spf=none
smtp.mfrom=bar-return-176164-ml=smtp.fakessh.eu at ml.ovh.net
Received: from 67.mail-out.ovh.net (67.mail-out.ovh.net [91.121.***.68])
by r13151.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C0199CC08B
for <ml at smtp.fakessh.eu>; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:15:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 27270 invoked by uid 503); 4 Jul 2011 08:16:42 -0000
Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail200.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59)
by 67.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2011 08:16:42 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50)
by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2011 10:15:03 +0200
Mailing-List: Pour toute requete administrative, contactez
bar-help at ml.ovh.net; Liste geree par ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:bar at ml.ovh.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bar-help at ml.ovh.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bar-unsubscribe at ml.ovh.net>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bar-subscribe at ml.ovh.net>
Reply-To: bar at ml.ovh.net
Delivered-To: mailing list bar at ml.ovh.net
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue) (213.186.33.50)
by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2011 10:15:03 +0200
Received: from smtp-out.ma**gasy.com (41.204.104.33)
by mx1.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2011 10:15:01 +0200
Received: from smtp-2.****line.mg (unknown [41.204.104.56])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp-out.ma**gasy.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6B1B94661;
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:15:00 +0300 (EAT)
Received: from localhost (antivirus3.ma**gasy.com [41.204.104.49])
by smtp-2.****line.mg (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6A36008C;
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:15:00 +0300 (EAT)
X-Virus-Scanned: par antivirus3.ma***gasy.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=7 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from smtp-2.b***line.mg ([41.204.104.56])
by localhost (antivirus3.ma**gasy.com [41.204.104.49]) (amavisd-new, port
10024)
with ESMTP id jEBXnDCKPoY4; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:14:54 +0300 (EAT)
Received: from packard.**tmb.org (staff-104-10.ma***gasy.com [41.204.104.10])
by smtp-2.blueline.mg (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A89860064;
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:14:53 +0300 (EAT)
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:14:53 +0300
From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@***tmb.org>
To: bar at ml.ovh.net
Cc: sd-basic at ml.ovh.net
Message-Id: <20110704111453.87dd4f6c.mihamina@**tmb.org>
In-Reply-To: <F712E05F-5E3F-47D3-B88F-2FE0D2B70626@****groupe.com>
References: <4E0EF717.1050300@****heberg.com>
<CA34CDAC.6BDF%julien@****vantage.com>
<BANLkTikxia48Erwkk6tZB9hCvOD9FFPK0g at mail.gmail.com>
<F712E05F-5E3F-47D3-B88F-2FE0D2B70626@****groupe.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 8540232269748607743
X-Ovh-Remote: 41.204.104.33 (smtp-out.ma**gasy.com)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.29 (mx1.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N
Subject: [bar] Re: [sd-basic] marketplace de SaaS
X-Length: 5051
X-UID: 1
I do not see why this email was issued in this box
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20110704/9cc148c8/attachment.bin>
More information about the dovecot
mailing list