[Dovecot] IMAP-proxy or not with sogo webmail and dovecot backend

[Michael M Slusarz]

Quoting Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>:

> On 14.2.2012, at 5.19, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
>
>>> b login (SAVEDSTATE 1234567890) user pass
>>
>> I guess the drawback for this approach is that you are explicitly  
>> breaking the LOGIN definition.
>
> No breaking, extending :)

Heh.  I should know better after reading about 1000 RFCs last year...

Anyway, to play devil's advocate, another drawback of this approach is  
that in the (fairly remote) chance that the LOGIN command is extended  
in the future by an RFC, there is no guarantee that this syntax would  
be used.

michael