[Dovecot] mbox vs. maildir storage block waste

Christoph Anton Mitterer calestyo at scientia.net
Tue Oct 30 13:31:40 EET 2012


On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 07:03 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> What makes the most sense for me is to use mbox (or mdbox) for longer 
> term storage that you may be offloading to slower storage systems, and 
> use maildir (or sdbox) for the new mails...
Was also something I thought about... still the more I think about it,
the more I hate, that with mbox meta-data is stored in the mails.


> Would work great as long as you have a reliable method for archiving 
> older mails out to your slower storage.
I still hope for some DB backend ;)


Chris.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5165 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20121030/6fbc9557/attachment.bin>


More information about the dovecot mailing list