[Dovecot] Strange output from LIST command

[azurIt]

> Od: Bron Gondwana <brong at fastmail.fm>
> Komu: <dovecot at dovecot.org>
> Dátum: 17.10.2013 12:30
> Predmet: Re: [Dovecot] Strange output from LIST command
>
> CC: "Timo Sirainen" <tss at iki.fi>
>On Thu, Oct 17, 2013, at 09:21 PM, azurIt wrote:
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> > Od: Bron Gondwana <brong at fastmail.fm>
>> > Komu: Michael M Slusarz <slusarz at curecanti.org>, <dovecot at dovecot.org>
>> > Dátum: 17.10.2013 12:14
>> > Predmet: Re: [Dovecot] Strange output from LIST command
>> >
>> >On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, at 06:23 AM, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
>> >> Quoting azurIt <azurit at pobox.sk>:
>> >> 
>> >> > i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command  
>> >> > looks strange:
>> >> >
>> >> > C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN))
>> >> > S: * LIST () "." "INBOX"
>> >> > S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena"
>> >> > S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEEN 0)
>> >> > S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Spam"
>> >> > S: * STATUS "INBOX.Spam" (UNSEEN 0)
>> >> > S: 4 OK List completed.
>> >> >
>> >> > The UNSEEN information for INBOX is completely missing. It is  
>> >> > correct behavior?
>> >> 
>> >> No.  RFC 5819 [2]:
>> >> 
>> >> "For each selectable mailbox matching the list pattern and selection  
>> >> options, the server MUST return an untagged LIST response followed by  
>> >> an untagged STATUS response containing the information requested in  
>> >> the STATUS return option."
>> >
>> >Just wondering if the INBOX was SELECTed at the time?  There's some fun
>> >interaction around STATUS and SELECT in RFC3501.
>> >
>> >Bron.
>> 
>> 
>> Here's the complete IMAP communication, see the (1) only:
>> http://bugs.horde.org/view.php?actionID=view_file&type=log&file=imap-ok.log&ticket=12748
>> 
>> I also find out that it's working ok when i LIST the INBOX alone like this:
>> C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN))
>> S: * LIST () "." "INBOX"
>> S: * STATUS "INBOX" (UNSEEN 2)
>> S: 4 OK List completed.
>> 
>> The information about UNSEEN messages is correct. It's only doing problems when listing multiple folders at once.
>
>Yeah, that definitely looks like a bug!  I've CC'd Timo to grab his attention :)


Can anyone confirm the bug? Will it be fixed in 2.1.x? Thank you.

azur