[Dovecot] Why are ACLs for non-existent mailboxes accepted?

Boris da-dovecotlist-15 at abelonline.de
Thu Feb 20 19:45:32 UTC 2014


Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to non-existent 
mailboxes. There is no error message. Is this intended behavior?

 I think it's bad because clients present a success message when indeed the 
intent of the user failed. Typos are hard to catch.


More information about the dovecot mailing list