Pigeonhole, vacation being sent incorrectly

[Nick Edwards]

jesus!
learn to use  precedence


On 11/26/14, Harry Mills <harry at opendium.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an issue with a vacation message in a sieve script. I can't see
> an error in the script itself.
>
> Pigeonhole version: 0.4.2-32
> Dovecot Version: 2.2.10
>
> The script was created by Ingo (part of the Horde suite), but I think
> the script is fine. The problem is that when a message is sent to the
> "everyone" group (and alias for every person in the organisation),
> vacation messages are being sent back which I believe is an error.
>
> The script is:
>
>
> ===============================================
> # Sieve Filter
> # Generated by Ingo (http://www.horde.org/apps/ingo/) (11/11/14,
> 5:20:06 pm GMT)
> require ["vacation", "regex", "fileinto"];
> # Vacation
> if allof ( not exists "list-help", not exists "list-unsubscribe", not
> exists "list-subscribe", not exists "list-owner", not exists
> "list-post", not exists "list-archive", not exists "list-id", not exists
> "Mailing-List", not header :comparator "i;ascii-casemap" :is
> "Precedence" ["list", "bulk", "junk"], not header :comparator
> "i;ascii-casemap" :matches "To" "Multiple recipients of*" ) {
>      if header :regex "Received" "^.*(2014) (\\(.*\\) )?..:..:..
> (\\(.*\\) )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" {
>      if header :regex "Received" "^.*(Nov) (\\(.*\\) )?.... (\\(.*\\)
> )?..:..:.. (\\(.*\\) )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" {
>      if header :regex "Received" "^.*(13|14|15|16|17|18) (\\(.*\\) )?...
> (\\(.*\\) )?.... (\\(.*\\) )?..:..:.. (\\(.*\\)
> )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" {
>      vacation :days 7 :addresses "user2" :subject "Out of office"
> "IMPORTANT MESSAGE^M
> THE MESSAGE
> ";
> }
> }
> }
> }
> ===============================================
>
> The user "User2" sent a vacation message back to the sender
> "user at example.com" in response to this message (headers only):
>
> ===============================================
> Return-path: <User at example.com>
> Envelope-to: everyone at example.com
> Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:16 +0000
> Received: from tunis.Exampledomain.local ([192.168.254.107] helo=Tunis)
>          by mail.example.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
>          (envelope-from <User at example.com>)
>          id 1XowwM-0007Qw-Cj
>          for everyone at example.com; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:10 +0000
> From: "User" <User at example.com>
> To: "Everyone at Example" <everyone at example.com>
> Subject: Electrician
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:10 -0000
> Organization: Example Consultancy
> Message-ID: <02e601cfff5c$051ec350$0f5c49f0$@example.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>          boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02E7_01CFFF5C.051FD4C0"
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
> Thread-Index: Ac//W17ujWbs6KgRRsOZFc7+qT45Tg==
> Content-Language: en-gb
> X-Spam-Note: SpamAssassin run bypassed - sent from local address
>
> This is a multipart message in MIME format.
>
> ===============================================
>
> I have checked RFC 5230 section 4.5 which states:
>
>     "Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's
>     email address is in a "To", "Cc", "Bcc", "Resent-To", "Resent-Cc", or
>     "Resent-Bcc" line of the original message.
>
> I cannot see the address for "user2 at example.com" in any of those fields,
> or indeed referenced anywhere in the email. Is this a bug, or am I
> misunderstanding something?
>
> Harry
> --
> Harry Mills                                         Tel: 01749 812100
> Managing Director                                   Mob: 07815 848818
> Opendium Ltd.                                       www.opendium.com
>