Mailsploit problem in responce of ENVELOPE

[TACHIBANA Masashi]

Hi,

Sorry, It comes by fetching ENVELOPE, not BODYSTRUCTURE.
For example:

A01 UID FETCH 24 (ENVELOPE)
* 4 FETCH (UID 24 ENVELOPE ("Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:44:35 +0900" "test2" ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) (("dev1" NIL "dev1-bounces" "example.com")) ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) (("user1" NIL "user1" "example.com")) (("dev1" NIL "dev1" "example.com")) NIL "<20171206084846.0000478C.0596 at example.com>" "<20171208004435.00006B4F.0014 at example.com>"))
A01 OK Fetch completed (0.000 secs).

> The metasploit generated emails contain a fake Reply-To header.  Are you
> sure that the above isn't the Reply-To header?

I did test also Reply-To header, then had same response as above.


----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 18:47:37 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I tried to see a mail that have a strange From header in bellow URL:
> > 
> > https://www.mailsploit.com/index
> > 
> > Then, I got BODYSTRUCTURE response contain next:
> > 
> > ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com"))
> > 
> > Are this problem already founded by anyone?
> > So already fixed?
> 
> The metasploit generated emails contain a fake Reply-To header.  Are you
> sure that the above isn't the Reply-To header?
> 
> The "FETCH 123 ENVELOPE" command will return both (and FETCH ALL includes
> ENVELOPE).  From the IMAP RFC:
> 
> 	The fields of the envelope structure are in the following order:
> 	date, subject, from, sender, reply-to, to, cc, bcc, in-reply-to, and
> 	message-id.
> 
> Can you paste the whole IMAP command response?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff.
> 

--
TACHIBANA Masashi  QUALITIA CO., LTD.
mailto:tachibana at qualitia.co.jp