BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag

Larry Rosenman larryrtx at gmail.com
Tue Dec 4 17:13:52 EET 2018


I've been using that recipe for YEARS, and it DOES work for me on FreeBSD
(I'm also the port maintainer for dovecot and pigeonhole).

Not sure exactly what you are doing wrong, but I use lmtp to deliver the
mail to mbox formatted mailboxes.



On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:11 AM Jakobus Schürz <wertstoffe at nurfuerspam.de>
wrote:

> I tried it like you... doesn't work. The message gets all the other flags,
> but not the \Seen-Flag.
>
> My repo is
>
> https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/debian/stretch stretch
> dpkg -l|grep dove
> ii  dovecot-core                      2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - core files
> ii  dovecot-imapd                     2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - IMAP daemon
> ii  dovecot-ldap                      2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - LDAP support
> ii  dovecot-lmtpd                     2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - LMTP server
> ii  dovecot-lucene                    2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - Lucene support
> ii  dovecot-managesieved              2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - ManageSieve server
> ii  dovecot-pop3d                     2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - POP3 daemon
> ii  dovecot-sieve                     2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - Sieve filters support
> ii  dovecot-solr                      2:2.3.4-2~stretch              amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - Solr support
>
>
>
> Am 04.12.18 um 16:04 schrieb Larry Rosenman:
>
> 2.3.4/0.5.4 (dovecot/pigeonhole)
>
> Note the casing on the \\Seen flag.
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:02 AM Jakobus Schürz <wertstoffe at nurfuerspam.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Which version of dovecot are you using?
>>
>>
>> jakob
>>
>> Am 04.12.18 um 15:44 schrieb Larry Rosenman:
>> > I have the following, and it works:
>> > require ["include","fileinto","imap4flags","variables"];
>> > global "MyFlags";
>> > if header :contains ["X-LERCTR-Spam-Flag","X-TNTSCAN-Spam-Flag"]  "YES"
>> > {
>> >    redirect "spamtrap at spambouncer.org";
>> >    addflag "MyFlags" "\\Seen Junk";
>> >    fileinto :flags "${MyFlags}" "SPAM";
>> >    stop;
>> > }
>> >
>> > FWIW.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:25 AM Jakobus Schürz <
>> wertstoffe at nurfuerspam.de>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Now i tried an additional rule in my "normal" working sieve-filter:
>> >>
>> >> if address :domain :matches "from" "company.example"
>> >>   { setflag "\\seen"; fileinto :create "INBOX/foo/test"; stop; }
>> >>
>> >> and sent an email from my company-account. The folder INBOX/foo/test
>> gets
>> >> created, but the message inside is not marked as seen.
>> >>
>> >> So i think, this is a bug in dovecot/pigeonhole, which ignores the
>> >> \\seen-Flag being set by sieve-script.
>> >>
>> >> I tried to set the seen-flag to the message with doveadm. This works
>> >> correctly.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> BG Jakob
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Am 04.12.18 um 14:23 schrieb Jakobus Schürz:
>> >>
>> >> Ok. I tried another Thunderbird-specific Flag:
>> >>
>> >> require ["imap4flags", "vnd.dovecot.pipe", "copy", "imapsieve",
>> "environment", "variables"];
>> >> if environment :matches "imap.email" "*" {
>> >>   set "email" "${1}";
>> >> }
>> >> addflag "Junk";
>> >> addflag "\\seen";
>> >> addflag "$label3";
>> >> pipe :copy "learn-spam.sh";
>> >> pipe :copy "learn-spam-sa.sh" [ "${email}" ];
>> >>
>> >> When i move an unflagged email to Folder Junk, it is shown in
>> Thunderbird
>> >> as "personal", Junk but Unseen.
>> >>
>> >> So, the rule is really working, except for the \\seen-Flag.
>> >>
>> >> I have the line
>> >>
>> >> addflag "\\seen";
>> >>
>> >> from the dovecot-wiki!
>> >>
>> >> BG jakob
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Am 04.12.18 um 14:06 schrieb Jakobus Schürz:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Ralph!
>> >>
>> >> This is, what calls the correct sive-filter rules. I have that already
>> >> in use.
>> >> But the file
>> >> file:/etc/dovecot/sievepipe/report-spam
>> >>
>> >> contains my sieve-script from my first posting.
>> >> So, the difference from setflag to addflag is, setflag sets the flags,
>> >> and only the given flags (removing all other flags), and addflag adds a
>> >> flag to the existing flags...
>> >>
>> >> I fiddled around a little...
>> >> The sieve-script sets the Junk-Flag, when it looks like:
>> >>
>> >> require ["imap4flags", "vnd.dovecot.pipe", "copy", "imapsieve",
>> >> "environment", "variables"];
>> >>
>> >> if environment :matches "imap.email" "*" {
>> >>   set "email" "${1}";
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> addflag "Junk \\seen";
>> >> pipe :copy "learn-spam.sh";
>> >> pipe :copy "learn-spam-sa.sh" [ "${email}" ];
>> >>
>> >> But the \\seen-Flag is not set.
>> >>
>> >> When i comment out the addflag-line, the Junk-Flag is not set. So the
>> >> line works correct... but only for the Junk-Flag, not for the
>> seen-Flag..
>>
>
>
> --
> Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
> Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c)     E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com
> US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Dr, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106
>
>

-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c)     E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com
US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Dr, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20181204/0dc71cbb/attachment.html>


More information about the dovecot mailing list