What's a Reasonable Inbox Size?

[asai at globalchangemusic.org]

> It depends on what you consider reasonable.
>
> The processing time of file operation that iterates through a mailbox
> will generally go up proportinately with size.  If you do a text search
> without some indexing system like Solr, it will take a very long time.
>
> If the mailbox is just some archive that you pile up and forget about it
> except for once in a blue moon retrieval, then it might be reasonable.
>
> If it's an active mailbox, it will be a pain to navigate, in the same
> way a single folder with 100K files or a file cabinet with huge stacks
> of envelopes.
>
> I would guess some partioning of the large mailboxes into smaller
> mailboxes would help with active mailboxes.  Most people spend most of
> their time on new/recent messages, so making time or size or subject
> based volmes wouldn't be a bad idea.
>
> If the bulk of the size are redundant copies of attachments, then 
> Dovecot's
> *dbox support de-duping which would aso help.
>

So, generally speaking, you don't want to have inboxes that just sync 
all day long, due to massive amounts of small files in the inbox.  This 
may be OK in the case of a rarely accessed archive folder, but not good 
for regularly accessed inboxes, etc.?