[EXT] Re: Support for MULTISEARCH

[Aki Tuomi]

> On 11/05/2020 14:09 Joe Wong <joewong99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:16 PM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:
> > 
> >  > On 11/05/2020 12:12 Joe Wong <joewong99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote:
> >  > > 
> >  > > 
> >  > > > On 10. May 2020, at 1.51, Peter <pch at myzel.net> wrote:
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > Am 10.05.20 um 00:22 schrieb Daniel Miller:
> >  > > >> Thank you - I'm aware of the virtual folder option and do use it. My interest is for a Windows client, EM Client, which I otherwise really enjoy. Unfortunately, they've implemented server-side searching only via MULTISEARCH - for reasons passing my understanding. So I was hoping to hear Dovecot either already had support or there were plans to implement it.
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > Virtual folder does not scale. Thank you for naming a client that does multisearch!
> >  > > 
> >  > > Virtual folder scales just fine. What makes you think it does not?
> >  > > 
> >  > > We have customers that have users with thousand folders and millions of emails and still virtual folder scales. 
> >  > > 
> >  > > Sami
> >  > > 
> >  > 
> >  > is this possible to *hide* the virtual folder from listing but make it SELECTable / EXAMINEable from IMAP?
> >  > 
> >  >
> >  
> >  namespace {
> >  location = virtual:... 
> >  hidden = yes
> >  }
> >  
> >  Aki
> 
> 
> * NAMESPACE (("" "/")) NIL NIL
> a OK Namespace completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs).
> a list "" "*"* LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" FromL3
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" Apple
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" JunkMail
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked \Trash) "/" Trash
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Drafts) "/" Drafts
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked) "/" SENT
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" virtual* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
> a OK List completed (0.003 + 0.000 + 0.003 secs).
> 
> It's now hidden in the namepsace but I can still see it in the folder list, is this expected?
>

Sorry, forgot to say

hidden=yes
list=no

Aki