<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17.04.18 12:40, Reio Remma wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:b1ca0913-28be-1f89-780e-8f93b46c58ab@mrstuudio.ee"
      type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17.04.18 12:38, Aki Tuomi wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote
        cite="mid:8d5adc4b-90dc-49a7-2061-16c3bc28fb98@dovecot.fi"
        type="cite">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=utf-8">
        <p><br>
        </p>
        <br>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:51f20094-5699-b7d9-4f4a-ee516929da37@mrstuudio.ee">
          <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
            charset=utf-8">
          Hello!<br>
          <br>
          I noticed SpamAssassin <b>spamc</b> usage has entered the
          documentation at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
            href="https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve</a><br>
          <br>
          I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in
          <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
            charset=utf-8">
          sa-learn-ham.sh  should use revoke instead of report for --ham
          messages?<br>
          <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
            charset=utf-8">
          <br>
          I started using imapsieve with spamc myself just a few weeks
          ago, but I haven't used the reporting ability yet.<br>
          <br>
          Reio<br>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        Hi!<br>
        <br>
        As the warning says, the scripts are untested. If you are able
        to test them and provide modified versions, or confirm they work
        it would be really welcome input!<br>
        <br>
        Aki<br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      The trouble is the revoke option for spamc is largely
      undocumented. :( I'll have a look at it anyway.<br>
      <br>
      Thanks,<br>
      Reio<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Okay, while the man page for spamc is unclear, spamc --help states
    that:<br>
    <pre>-C, --reporttype reporttype
    Report message to collaborative filtering databases.
    <b>Report type should be 'report' for </b><b>spam or 'revoke' for ham.</b>

</pre>
    I've no idea why they can't pick that automatically. :) Off to
    testing.<br>
    <br>
    Reio<br>
  </body>
</html>