<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17.04.18 12:38, Aki Tuomi wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:8d5adc4b-90dc-49a7-2061-16c3bc28fb98@dovecot.fi"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:51f20094-5699-b7d9-4f4a-ee516929da37@mrstuudio.ee">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
Hello!<br>
<br>
I noticed SpamAssassin <b>spamc</b> usage has entered the
documentation at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve</a><br>
<br>
I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
sa-learn-ham.sh should use revoke instead of report for --ham
messages?<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<br>
I started using imapsieve with spamc myself just a few weeks
ago, but I haven't used the reporting ability yet.<br>
<br>
Reio<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hi!<br>
<br>
As the warning says, the scripts are untested. If you are able to
test them and provide modified versions, or confirm they work it
would be really welcome input!<br>
<br>
Aki<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The trouble is the revoke option for spamc is largely undocumented.
:( I'll have a look at it anyway.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Reio<br>
</body>
</html>